• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

D&D 4E Does anyone agree with me about 4E?

I find it amusing that someone like you (with a post count of 9) would even consider disagreeing with someone who has made thousands of posts (mostly when sitting in his parents' basement eating M&M's by the fistful). You do realize that post count is a direct indicator of intelligence, don't you?

Come back when you have made several hundred more inane posts in other threads.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Fifth Element said:
I find it amusing that someone like you (with a post count of 9) would even consider disagreeing with someone who has made thousands of posts (mostly when sitting in his parents' basement eating M&M's by the fistful). You do realize that post count is a direct indicator of intelligence, don't you?

Come back when you have made several hundred more inane posts in other threads.

QFT
 


As I lurk and note the intelligent, and not so intelligent, points argued skillfully, and not so skillfully, I make a witty rejoinder, or perhaps not so witty, and then ignore the thread evermore.
 


Patryn of Elvenshae said:
I have not read the thread at all, but I am telling you this up front so it's okay ...



I strongly disagree with an item stated in the original post, and here is a three paragraph treatise on why it is wrong, why the change / retention in the rules / flavor is a good / bad thing. I use lots of twenty-dollar words like metagame analysis, player-gamespace interface, conflate, and Gaussian distributions. I will misuse at least one word repeatedly.

EDIT:

Apparently, the OP has changed his opinion in the multitude of posts since the first, and the point which I raise has already been the subject of more than a dozen posts' worth of discussion.

Nonetheless, I will leave my mini-essay here for the edification of others.

Me too.
 

Godwin's Law

KoshPWNZYou said:
See, now you -know- that I prefer FunWrongBad, because I've stated such in four or five other threads and you obviously are familiar with all of my posts because my posts are the best thing this community's got going for it.

Your responses echo the other trolls so much that I know you must really be sock puppet for 5th element, the original troll. If you are not merely a sok puppet then you are clearly a nazi follower of 5th element.
 

The more I hear all of this troll talk, the more I am convinced that "troll" is the 4e mystery race. Now I proceed to make an uncalled-for announcement that has no basis in fact:

You heard it here first! The 4e mystery race is: trolls! But expect the PC trolls to be controversial. Firstly, in a bold move to support DDO, WotC has hard-coded it into the rules that trolls can be used as a PC race for online games only. Secondly, in a direct contradiction of all previous editions of D&D, online PC trolls are made stronger by flames.
 

No, clearly the mystery race is a trollish elf, or trolladrin. I berate the designers for their lack of creativity by including only elf races in the PHB, and suggest I could design a better game in my sleep.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top