Gruns
Explorer
Ok...
If you read the explanation in my post, you'll see why the correction is not so simple. The group is already tactically insufficient. To remove their one saving grace of occassionally dealing Sneak Attack damage twice in the same round (which I also mentioned rarely actually happens) would totally gimp this party even more than they gimp themselves.
As I said, when we realized the mistake, we considered changing the Warlord into a Cleric, since Warlords are much less effective when you only have two allies as opposed to the expected four. This would require a change from Eladrin to Dwarf or something, and basically be a whole new character from concept to completion. In the end, we decided to opt for the more fun, easy route and let this rule slide. It's not like the rogue is trying to use a Double Bladed Sword as a light blade or something ridiculous like that...
Later
Gruns
So now that they know the rule...they aren't correcting themselves? To each his own, I guess. Our group makes mistakes all the time; when we find out, we correct them. Simple.
If you read the explanation in my post, you'll see why the correction is not so simple. The group is already tactically insufficient. To remove their one saving grace of occassionally dealing Sneak Attack damage twice in the same round (which I also mentioned rarely actually happens) would totally gimp this party even more than they gimp themselves.
As I said, when we realized the mistake, we considered changing the Warlord into a Cleric, since Warlords are much less effective when you only have two allies as opposed to the expected four. This would require a change from Eladrin to Dwarf or something, and basically be a whole new character from concept to completion. In the end, we decided to opt for the more fun, easy route and let this rule slide. It's not like the rogue is trying to use a Double Bladed Sword as a light blade or something ridiculous like that...
Later
Gruns