Paul Farquhar
Legend
It seems mostly a case of "what can we ask questions on". The idea that literature has a role in social commentary seems to have fallen between the cracks. There is a drift away from studying literature at all, to focus on semantics and linguistics. An awful lot of English teachers don't seem to read much fiction these days.Interesting. Never understood breaking up literature chronologically past looking at inspiration and social commentary for any giving piece of work.
I've seen it played, and it worked in pretty much the way you describe. But I think it relies a lot on the player to supply the whimsicality. Its hard to hard-code roleplaying into rules, and I'm not sure it's desirable.On the subject of the artificer within 5e one of the big complaints I see is it doesn't quite capture the essence that the class represents. Keeping to the literary theme, the class is supposedly the Terry Pratchett of classes. Equals part ridiculous, whimsical, magical, and serious. It's missing something that captures this.Did they lean to much on the ill-defined crafting system or does spontaneous casting make it bland?
Have you read the "Tasha's" comments? They pretty much described our artificer to a tee.