D&D General Dungeons & Dragons Encyclopedia - new product

[Parmandur]

Except, of course, that it's not accurate due to it not being the first such official title

Name one similar reference text.

 

[Alzrius]

Name one similar reference text.

Name how that promo specifies reference texts when it says "official title."

 

[Parmandur]

Name how that promo specifies reference texts when it says "official title."

Again, if you can name one reference text I would appreciate it. It is clear from the context of a blurb for a reference encyclopedia that this is talking about, inf act, reference encyclopedias. As far as I can recall, prior oens were all generic or Forgotten Realms specific.

 

[Alzrius]

Again, if you can name one reference text I would appreciate it.

I'll repeat: if you can name why it has to be a reference text instead of an official title, that'd be great.

It is clear from the context of a blurb for a reference encyclopedia that this is talking about, inf act, reference encyclopedias.

How specifically is that clear? What part of the quoted blurb do you find to be "clear" in its indication of reference encyclopedias?

As far as I can recall, prior oens were all generic or Forgotten Realms specific.

That's only if you can justify your stance that "official title" means "reference encyclopedia."

 

[Parmandur]

I'll repeat: if you can name why it has to be a reference text instead of an official title, that'd be great.

If you can, I will admit you are right. Fair enough?

How specifically is that clear? What part of the quoted blurb do you find to be "clear" in its indication of reference encyclopedias?

It is from the back cover of a reference encyclopedia.

That's only if you can justify your stance that "official title" means "reference encyclopedia."

Again, this is the text from the cover of a reference encyclopedia.

 

[Alzrius]

If you can, I will admit you are right. Fair enough?

No, not fair enough, because that'd grant your premise that "official title" means "reference encyclopedia" which doesn't hold water.

It is from the back cover of a reference encyclopedia.

And the relevance of where it's printed is...?

Again, this is the text from the cover of a reference encyclopedia.

See above.

 

[Parmandur]

No, not fair enough, because that'd grant your premise that "official title" means "reference encyclopedia" which doesn't hold water.

OK, thanks for conceding that you cannot find such , appreciate it.

 

[Azzy]

OMG, guys! Obsessing over a marketing blurb is next-level ridiculous. Please touch grass.

 

[Alzrius]

OK, thanks for conceding that I am correct, appreciate it.

I'm grateful that you've admitted that you're wrong; next time do it faster and save us all some time.

 

[Parmandur]

I'm grateful that you've admitted that you're wrong; next time do it faster and save us all some time.

I did edit my statement slightly, but the point stands: if you can find a similar reference text, I will admit you are correct. If you cannot, I understand, then the statement that this is a first time ever product makes sense.