Dungeons & Dragons Releases New Unearthed Arcana Subclasses, Strongly Hinting at Dark Sun

It appears a Dark Sun campaign setting book is coming out in 2026.
1755804660144.png


Wizards of the Coast has released four new D&D subclasses for playtesting, all of which have heavy thematic ties to the post-apocalyptic Dark Sun setting. The four subclasses, released as "Apocalyptic Subclasses," include the Circle of Preservation Druid, the Gladiator Fighter, the Defiled Sorcerer, and the Sorcerer-King Patron Warlock. Although not stated outright, the Gladiator and Sorcerer-King Patron are explicit nods to the Dark Sun setting, set in a ruined world ruled by Sorcerer-Kings where gladiatorial fights were common.

The Circle of Preservation Druid creates areas of preserved land that grants buffs to those who stand upon it. The Gladiator adds secondary Weapon Mastery properties to their attacks, with bonus abilities. Notably, the Gladiator uses Charisma as its secondary stat. The Defiled Sorcerer can expend its hit dice to amp up damage to its attacks and can also steal the life of its targets to deal additional damage. The Sorcerer-King Patron gains a number of abilities tying into tyranny and oppression, with the ability to cast Command as a Bonus Action without expending a spell slot, causing targets to gain the Frightened Condition, and forcing those who attack them to re-roll successful attacks.

The survey for the subclasses goes live on August 28th.

 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer


log in or register to remove this ad

Nerds be nerd'n hard about this one!

Who are we kidding? If it has some eclectic artwork and a handful of interesting ideas (to the masses!) it'll sell like hotcakes.

Sure, we'll talk about how it's a commercial disaster that threatens the fabric of space and time despite the absence of any hard data, and chances are any controversy we create about it will actually FUEL greater interest and MORE sales, but it's only one book among dozens. No big deal?
 

Nerds be nerd'n hard about this one!

Who are we kidding? If it has some eclectic artwork and a handful of interesting ideas (to the masses!) it'll sell like hotcakes.

Sure, we'll talk about how it's a commercial disaster that threatens the fabric of space and time despite the absence of any hard data, and chances are any controversy we create about it will actually FUEL greater interest and MORE sales, but it's only one book among dozens. No big deal?

Dismissive opinions be dismissing HARD, amirite?
 

That has been WotC's policy, but they own the IP, they could open whatever they want on DM's Guild.
I don't see a reason WotC will change it. WotC has not reacted to any of the criticisms over thier Eberron, Dragonlance, Forgotten Realms, Greyhawk, Planescape, Spelljammer or Ravenloft changes. Each of them sold well enough despite the "backlash". A Dark Sun "hated" by the "fans" will still sell well enough for WotC and they will get a kickback from the fans who publish DM guild products "fixing" the issues they have with it.

Unless they pull a blunder on par with hadozee, this is a win/win for them.
 

Dismissive opinions be dismissing HARD, amirite?
It's really easy to see the difference between this new Dark Sun and anything announced by anyone OTHER than WotC though. That's for sure. Paizo's announcements are met with huge grains of salt, reasonable opinions, balanced viewpoints and a ticker-tape parade, but when WotC hints at something?? Ooh, lord, better watch out!
 

I don't see a reason WotC will change it. WotC has not reacted to any of the criticisms over thier Eberron, Dragonlance, Forgotten Realms, Greyhawk, Planescape, Spelljammer or Ravenloft changes. Each of them sold well enough despite the "backlash". A Dark Sun "hated" by the "fans" will still sell well enough for WotC and they will get a kickback from the fans who publish DM guild products "fixing" the issues they have with it.

Unless they pull a blunder on par with hadozee, this is a win/win for them.
I also don't think that they will change it. I was replying to the statement that there is a "need" for a 5e product in order to open up a setting. There is not. It's, as you say, a policy that they are free to continue or change as they see fit.

I'm unclear about the rest of the answer: why do you mention backlash against revised settings? It has nothing to do with my point.
 

It's really easy to see the difference between this new Dark Sun and anything announced by anyone OTHER than WotC though. That's for sure. Paizo's announcements are met with huge grains of salt, reasonable opinions, balanced viewpoints and a ticker-tape parade, but when WotC hints at something?? Ooh, lord, better watch out!
Must suck being the big dog. Of course, this is true only if you ignore smaller companies that also got blowback for products (and honestly, this isn’t even blowback).
 

Must suck being the big dog. Of course, this is true only if you ignore smaller companies that also got blowback for products (and honestly, this isn’t even blowback).
Not like Paizo's a mom 'n pop though. They're pretty big too based on the arguments I've seen about it here. At least that's what I've been repeatedly told. Paizo almost took down the big dog at one time. That's been aggressively alleged.

Not a fan of intensely biased arguments either way. Is it off base to suggest we wait till we have some concrete info about Dark Sun before we eviscerate it?
 

Not like Paizo's a mom 'n pop though. They're pretty big too based on the arguments I've seen about it here. At least that's what I've been repeatedly told. Paizo almost took down the big dog at one time. That's been aggressively alleged.

Not a fan of intensely biased arguments either way. Is it off base to suggest we wait till we have some concrete info about Dark Sun before we eviscerate it?
Well, I wasn’t really thinking of Paizo as an example so much as I was thinking Goodman Games recently.

But I guess I don’t see anything in this thread eviscerating…anything really.
 

I also don't think that they will change it. I was replying to the statement that there is a "need" for a 5e product in order to open up a setting. There is not. It's, as you say, a policy that they are free to continue or change as they see fit.

I'm unclear about the rest of the answer: why do you mention backlash against revised settings? It has nothing to do with my point.
I was under the impression that you felt WotC shouldn't release a new DS book (because they won't do it" justice") and instead put it in the Guild as is and let the fans release it instead. I'm saying WotC will release it's version (and make money) and then the fans will try to fix it (and WotC will make residuals from it).
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top