CRGreathouse said:Yes, but attacks would be at a -4 penalty, since it's an exotic weapon.
drowdude said:But the dwarven war-axe is considered a medium-sized martial weapon (when used 2-handed)... couldnt a small character use it with 2-hands anyways without the feat?
From the SRD
Waraxe, Dwarven: A dwarven waraxe is too large to use in one hand without special training; thus, it is an exotic weapon. A Medium-size character can use a dwarven waraxe two-handed as a martial weapon, or a Large creature can use it one-handed in the same way.
Bobbystopholes said:Yarp, I agree. I says Medium in the books and from the descriptions, I will let my groups female halfling barbarian use the bastard sword! LOL! It is such a nice visual![]()
Sorry, I meant two handed with the feat. Not without. I was also agreeing with the entire thread that said I could. I thought yours said they could too.If you agree, then why on earth, do you go against it ?
Bobbystopholes said:Sorry, I meant two handed with the feat.
AGGEMAM said:Whether a small sized character can use a bastard sword (or the like) two-handed with the feat is questionaery at best, but rules are silent on this matter.
AGGEMAM said:Incorrect, see below.
Whether a small sized character can use a bastard sword (or the like) two-handed with the feat is questionaery at best, but rules are silent on this matter.