AGGEMAM First Post Jul 29, 2002 #21 CRGreathouse said: Incorrect, see above. Click to expand... LOA However, you were incorrect, I was speculative .. Last edited: Jul 29, 2002
CRGreathouse said: Incorrect, see above. Click to expand... LOA However, you were incorrect, I was speculative ..
AGGEMAM First Post Jul 29, 2002 #22 CRGreathouse said: Incorrect. (As a personal note, I think the rules on bastard sword/dwarven waraxe/etc. should be revised to say: "This weapon may be used as a Martial weapon one size larger." This would eliminate all confusion...) Click to expand... How can it be incorrect that I can see it go ways, oh well .. I agree with your personal note, though.
CRGreathouse said: Incorrect. (As a personal note, I think the rules on bastard sword/dwarven waraxe/etc. should be revised to say: "This weapon may be used as a Martial weapon one size larger." This would eliminate all confusion...) Click to expand... How can it be incorrect that I can see it go ways, oh well .. I agree with your personal note, though.
drowdude First Post Jul 29, 2002 #23 CRGreathouse said: Yes, but attacks would be at a -4 penalty, since it's an exotic weapon. Click to expand... But it's not exotic if it's used 2-handed....
CRGreathouse said: Yes, but attacks would be at a -4 penalty, since it's an exotic weapon. Click to expand... But it's not exotic if it's used 2-handed....
drowdude First Post Jul 29, 2002 #24 AGGEMAM said: No, because it is only a martial weapon for a medium-sized (or larger) character. Click to expand... In regards to the SRD quote: Ah, IC... all becomes clear...
AGGEMAM said: No, because it is only a martial weapon for a medium-sized (or larger) character. Click to expand... In regards to the SRD quote: Ah, IC... all becomes clear...
