ECL Challenge

[Bill Muench]

Remember... CR isn't ECL... unless you meant ECL... I don't have the list of them here at work...

I know, I just don't know what a Spellweaver's ECL is offhand.

 

[kreynolds]

OK, you want a broken combination?

Man, I really wish I had come up with that combo!

 

[Kae'Yoss]

OK, you want a broken combination?

Level 1 Wizard Efreet vs... well, whatever level a human wizard is.
Efreet has a bat familiar.

Round 1:
Bat takes a standard action, asks Efreet "I wish that wizard had been born without arms."
The bat is not a genie, so the efreet can grant the wish.

Human wizard can no longer hold components, wands, scrolls, weapons, etc...

Pretty easy after that.

Hee hee hee

 

[hammymchamham]

Using a creature of at least ECL +4 or better, come up with any spellcaster that is equal or better to a corresponding human of the same total level. Try to stick to TSR books if possible.

Lets see if it can be done.

Can you list the TSR books you refer to, since they haven't done anything for a few years

 

[Wippit Guud]

Re: Re: ECL Challenge

Can you list the TSR books you refer to, since they haven't done anything for a few years

A few years? Didn't MM2 come out a couple of months ago?

Anyways... basically whatever isn't put out by Wizards for d20... Don't wanna worry about books from Natural Press or Mongoose or the like... cause I don't have many of them.

 

[Azure Trance]

Re: Re: ECL Challenge

Can you list the TSR books you refer to, since they haven't done anything for a few years

:-D Hey now, my PHB and MM1 both say TSR... on my bookspine

 

[Kae'Yoss]

Re: Re: Re: ECL Challenge

A few years? Didn't MM2 come out a couple of months ago?

Anyways... basically whatever isn't put out by Wizards for d20... Don't wanna worry about books from Natural Press or Mongoose or the like... cause I don't have many of them.

You don't mean TSR, you mean Wizards of the Coast. TSR is no more, and that's what he meant.

 

[Wippit Guud]

Oh geez... why the hell are people so nit-picky about exact terminology. If I say TSR because I've been playing this game since '83, it's because I'm nostaligic. Will I get yelled at for using 1st edition stat layouts? (Str, int, wis, dex, con, cha, which is still the order I use)

The topic is ECL, there was no ECLs in 2ed or 1st, so it's pretty obvious I'm talking about 3ed stuff, and since TSR was bought by Wizards, it's pretty obvious I'm talking about Wizards stuff.

 

[hammymchamham]

Oh geez... why the hell are people so nit-picky about exact terminology. If I say TSR because I've been playing this game since '83, it's because I'm nostaligic. Will I get yelled at for using 1st edition stat layouts? (Str, int, wis, dex, con, cha, which is still the order I use)

The topic is ECL, there was no ECLs in 2ed or 1st, so it's pretty obvious I'm talking about 3ed stuff, and since TSR was bought by Wizards, it's pretty obvious I'm talking about Wizards stuff.

Lighten up man or woman!

 

[Wippit Guud]

On general chat, I'm light.

On rules... I'm serious. Rules do that to me.

And, for the record... man... I think... (checks inside pants) yep... man.



(uh-oh, I lightened up on Rules, this isn't right...)