Ego Ideals and Player Characters...

fireinthedust

Explorer
I just wrote this on my blog (see my signature) but I figure I'll post here and open it up for debate (feel free to comment on the blog, btw; it's new and no one else has done that yet!)

Maybe tell me what you think: could I be right?

(ahem)

As the head of my own massive RPG empire, I felt it was my duty to pick up some books and go a-reading. After all, Joseph Goodman at Goodman Games thought it was a good idea to read through every book on Gygax’s Appendix N list, which makes sense considering he’s spent the last little while shaping the gaming industry Gygax (, Arneson, et al) initiated. I’ve taken to the list myself, I’ve gotten through some of Elric, Conan, and a good pile of other Robert E. Howard and HPL stories to boot; and I’ve a good pile of Appendix N pulp books from my local book shop to last me through another 10-month Canadian winter and then some.


In a quick break between Sword and Sorcery, however, I picked up a book on management (re: my plane-spanning Empire), and found a gem that’s really gotten me thinking. The section was on motivation, the assumptions about people we have about work:
The Psychological Assumption: … A person is a complex, unfolding, maturing organism who passes through physiological and psychological stages of development. We evolve an ego ideal towards which we strive. The most powerful motivating force in us, over and above such basic drives as hunger, sexuality, aggression, is the need to bring ourselves closer to our ideal. The greater the gap between our perception of ourselves in reality and our ego idea, the more angry we are with ourselves and the more guilt we feel. Work is part of our identity, our ego ideal, and opportunities must be provided for us to work towards our ego ideal in work if we are to be motivated.
In short (too late): we have an ideal, we spend our lives trying to be that person, and the greater the difference between us and that person, the more we hate ourselves. To be happy, we need the oppotunity to get closer to that ideal.


Obviously this was written with role playing games in mind!


Look at what we players do: we make up characters. For years I’ve thought of character generation as a sort of Myers-Briggs test for the player AT THAT MOMENT: what do they feel like doing? What are they hoping to be? WHO do they wish they were? What is their life like that, with their personality, they insisted on being a bard/monk/gnome/cleric?


What’s interesting is that the Alignment of Lawful Good is easily the most harped-about alignment in RPGs. Sorry, “Lawful Stupid”. And yet, for the last 30+ years Paladins have come to be one of the most popular characters to play. I’m constantly seeing Paladin PCs in games that I run, and to be frank, back in the day they were a big pain in the butt: less treasure than everyone else, fewer items, followers, and the alignment restrictions not just for them but those with whom they worked, it really was a lot of extra work for seemingly no payoff; and yet, droves of people kept playing them. In no iteration of the rules have they really been left out. There is some kind of satisfaction inherent in playing a Paladin. There has to be, to keep at it when the villains, the other alignments, and even other players hate you!


Paladins aren’t the only popular characters, obviously, and power certainly comes into it for some in designing their heroes. Competence and reliability, more than anything else, is the sign of a well-made character sheet, and high enough stats. The cunning rogue, the kindly cleric, and of course the brilliant mind of the party mage.
More than the cliche types, after a while a good player can really get into their character: imagine how they’d handle various situations, who they might be as a person, give them a personality. Like an actor who takes on a beloved role, who becomes that character on film, a Player can “become” their Character, even for a little while each week.


Maybe we can take that Ego Ideal and replace it with who we wish we could be more like. Maybe we can even let that character help us develop: more confident, more athletic, more detail-oriented than we have been. And not just one: so many different characters can be made, could we learn something from the barbarian one week, the wizard the next? Could the cleric help us learn to live for other people than ourselves? Could the paladin teach us, disheveled, manky us, what it means to have ideals and ethical principles, and live them instead of just paying lipservice?


For the truly imaginative, role playing games are an opportunity to meet heroes, to become more like actual heroic versions of ourselves than we might otherwise have access to in the world of “reality” television and its superficial, tacky role-models.


And maybe, just maybe, that’s the real reason so many people who have found roleplaying games, love them so much.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I've mentioned this phrase in another thread as well, however i think it's even more appropriate in this one.

It's a phrase written in the early White Wolf books, and it had always caught my attention, no matter how many times I opened those books.

Never treat your characters as projections of yourself (even if that's all they are).

Treat them as unique individuals, as works of art, or as fragile expressions of your poetic sensitivity.

You must treasure the characters you create.
 

I think you're correct. I can certainly look back at choices I've made in RPG's and apply them to who I was at the time. I can see it in the characters I've played recently.
 

All my characters say something about me. None of them reflect my ideals.

(In fact, I don't think conceptualizing things in terms of "current self" vs. "ideal self" is particularly accurate or helpful. Formulations like that are more aesthetically pleasing than truthful, IMHO)

For example, the 4e paladin I played for 2.5 years was, among other things: fearless, oblivious, morbidly obese, both a propagandist and a pornographer (albeit somewhat inadvertently), unshakeable in his belief, miniscule in ability to reason properly, and big in Hell (as in "oh, he's big in Japan").

None of those things, I hope, apply to me.

That paladin did, however, reflect my desire to be entertaining, to be the author and performer of an amusing character, to make people laugh. Which he did. For years.
 
Last edited:

Ah, well, I don't know. I think this is a bit simplistic.

It already starts with the premise: My 'ideal self' is a moving target, it changes and evolves all the time. It's not a steady progression or development towards a fixed target. It can at times be circular or involve backtracking.

And applying it to my rpg chars? Very doubtful. My #1 goal is usually this: "Don't repeat yourself!"

I always try to come up with fresh character concepts that I've never played in exactly the same configuration. It's also why I often end up with pretty exotic, convoluted backgrounds.

As a player, I reread my character's traits before every session to make sure I stay true to my original vision rather than 'defaulting' into playing my alter-ego.

I don't doubt that a little bit of my personality can be found in every character, but I think it's different aspects and degrees.

I also enjoy exploring character motivations that are alien to my real self, i.e. put myself into someone else's shoes to see how it 'feels like'. Those characters tend to be short-lived, though (this is also one reason why I enjoy being the DM: you get to play all kinds of different persons in a very short time. It's also one of the biggest benefits of adopting Ars Magica's troupe style of playing).

Finally, the very specific case of Paladins: With the expection of one player in my group, they aren't popular at all (that player also happens to be a cop in real life - go figure!).

The only time I've been interested in playing one was after reading some novels by Eddings about a bunch of knights that had very differing views of what 'behaving like a knight' meant. I.e. I wanted to play a 'Greyguard' paladin.
The 'standard' paladin is too predictable and boring for my taste.

There are many players that seem to enjoy playing themselves or a certain heroic image of themselves regularly or even exclusively, but it's not a general phenomenon. It's just one approach of many towards roleplaying.
 

Remove ads

Top