Wormwood
Adventurer
I'm very uncertain as to what form the mechanics will take (presuming that it has mechanics at all).
Edition neutral seems to be the thing going forward. In this case, I can only hope.
I'm very uncertain as to what form the mechanics will take (presuming that it has mechanics at all).
This sounds cool, but while I think Ed can put his home version of the Realms into an organized, readable format, I'm very uncertain as to what form the mechanics will take (presuming that it has mechanics at all).
My understanding is that Ed doesn't play 4E, and I'm not at all sure he ever used 3.X either. So if this book does have stats, someone else will be brought on board to convert things over (which will pollute the idea that this is Ed's own Realms), or this will be another "legacy" product (a la the 1E reprintings).
One of tweets I read, I forget which one, mentioned that Ed might refer to older mechanics in the text, but it has been formatted to be relatively system-neutral.Edition neutral seems to be the thing going forward. In this case, I can only hope.
On the other hand, Mearls seemed to say that they want to support all timelines of settings; don't know how they'll do that.
This sounds cool, but while I think Ed can put his home version of the Realms into an organized, readable format, I'm very uncertain as to what form the mechanics will take (presuming that it has mechanics at all).
My understanding is that Ed doesn't play 4E, and I'm not at all sure he ever used 3.X either. So if this book does have stats, someone else will be brought on board to convert things over (which will pollute the idea that this is Ed's own Realms), or this will be another "legacy" product (a la the 1E reprintings).
To be fair, several of Ed's contributions for Realmslore in the form of free (at the time) Forgotten Realms articles on the WotC website were accompanied by 3.5 game rules that did a pretty good job of mating up mechanics with his material.My understanding is that Ed doesn't play 4E, and I'm not at all sure he ever used 3.X either. So if this book does have stats, someone else will be brought on board to convert things over (which will pollute the idea that this is Ed's own Realms), or this will be another "legacy" product (a la the 1E reprintings).
That's because SKR did the rules updates, and SKR has a very good understanding of both the Realms and 3.x mechanics.To be fair, several of Ed's contributions for Realmslore in the form of free (at the time) Forgotten Realms articles on the WotC website were accompanied by 3.5 game rules that did a pretty good job of mating up mechanics with his material.
Wyrms of the North and stuff like that.