[EN World Book Club] Suggestions & Selectors

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm supposed to post the next book for discussion on the 15th, but I'm having a difficult time choosing what to read. I've narrowed it down to 4 choices, but I can't decide which to choose. Should I post the 4 choices and see what others want to read? Should I roll a d4 and go with that? Of the 4, three are classic SF (one each from the 50s, 60s, and 70s), and one is sort of SF/Fantasy/Weird mix from the 80s. I've read 1 of the books, but it's been on my "reread" list for years. I'm tempted to go with the SF/Fantasy/Weird book from the 80s, but I know some people would like to read something that is not fantasy. Any ideas? Who knows, I may just decide to go with something else entirely.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I'd be interested in seeing what your thoughts are. That said, pick the book you think will be generate the most interesting disucussion, which hopefully coincides with the one you want to read (or re-read) most.
 


Would love to hear what books you are considering.

Of course, you should make it clear that you are not putting this up for a vote, and will still go with the book you consider to be the best choice.

If you don't tell us ahead of time, will you tell us after you make the decision, so we know what books just missed out? Like rjmc64, I am always open to suggestions for my reading list.
 

Since there seems to be interest in which books I'm considering, I'll list them. But as Joe mentioned, this isn't a vote. Think of it as me talking to myself, and everyone is listening. Feel free to offer opinions, but don't expect me to listen to you.
wink.gif


Anubis Gates by Tim Powers (winner of the 1984 Philip K. Dick Award, ranked among the top fantasy novels ever written by Locus Magazine readers poll)

More Than Human by Theodore Sturgeon (winner of the 1954 International Fantasy Award, ranked among the top SF novels ever written by Locus Magazine readers poll)

UBIK by Philip K. Dick (ranked among the top SF novels ever written by the Locus Magazine readers poll)

Forever War by Joe Haldemon (winner of the 1976 Hugo and Nebula awards, ranked among the top fantasy novels ever written by Locus Magazine readers poll)

FWIW, I most want to read Anubis Gates, and I read UBIK about 10 years ago. The others have been recommended to me many times.

So, there's a sneak peak at my thought process. Who knows, between now and the weekend, I may choose an entirely different book.
 

Cthulhu's Librarian said:
FWIW, I most want to read Anubis Gates, and I read UBIK about 10 years ago. The others have been recommended to me many times.
I've been meaning to read that book for a while. In fact, the copy I reserved at the library came in yesterday.
 

I hope this series isn't too off topic (personally I don't feel that it is) but I would like to nominate Stephen King's The Dark Tower saga. In particular, since only one book is asked for, The Gunslinger.

The first problem is that there are two known versions of the text which might cause problems. The Revised Edition contains a few changes and polish to better make it fit with the other books (the series has been written over a long period of time). The second problem is that The Gunslinger is not the best example of a standalone book, and the other volumes need to be read in order to fully appreciate it and the references within.

Perhaps if it is picked and all goes well, readings of the other 7 volumes can be done. The last two volumes will be released this year, so there is plenty of time if we started now.

The Dark Tower Volume I: The Gunslinger is $11.17 in Packerback and $17.50 in Hardback and because of King's popularity, copies should be VERY easy to find at your public library--no purchase really necessary.

It combines elements of The Old West, Fantasy (especially Tolkien, I can even pick out a few references here and there) and horror. Here is what amazon.com has to say about it.
Thirty-three years, a horrific and life-altering accident, and thousands of desperately rabid fans in the making, Stephen King's quest to complete his magnum opus rivals the quest of Roland and his band of gunslingers who inhabit the Dark Tower series. Loyal DT fans and new readers alike will appreciate this revised edition of The Gunslinger, which breathes new life into Roland of Gilead, and offers readers a "clearer start and slightly easier entry into Roland's world."

King writes both a new introduction and foreword to this revised edition, and the ever-patient, ever-loyal "constant reader" is rewarded with secrets to the series's inception. That a "magic" ream of green paper and a Robert Browning poem, came together to reveal to King his "ka" is no real surprise (this is King after all), but who would have thought that the squinty-eyed trio of Clint Eastwood, Lee Van Cleef, and Eli Wallach would set the author on his true path to the Tower? While King credits Tolkien for inspiring the "quest and magic" that pervades the series, it was Sergio Leone's The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly that helped create the epic proportions and "almost absurdly majestic western backdrop" of Roland's world.

To King, The Gunslinger demanded revision because once the series was complete it became obvious that "the beginning was out of sync with the ending." While the revision adds only 35 pages, Dark Tower purists will notice the changes to Allie's fate and Roland's interaction with Cort, Jake, and the Man in Black--all stellar scenes that will reignite the hunger for the rest of the series. Newcomers will appreciate the details and insight into Roland's life. The revised Roland of Gilead (nee Deschain) is embodied with more humanity--he loves, he pities, he regrets. What DT fans might miss is the same ambiguity and mystery of the original that gave the original its pulpy underground feel (back when King himself awaited word from Roland's world).

The Dark Tower Website: http://www.stephenking.com/darktower/
 



kingpaul said:
This is an early April Fool's joke, yes? :D
Not sure where the comment is directed, but if it's regarding the date, then its no joke. The discussion period for Ergaon is slated for roughly 2 weeks, which gives partipcants one month to read the next selection.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top