It's odd... But I think it's Erikson's deliberately chosen style to never explain anything. This is hugely disorienting at first, but the whole series becomes very rewarding, IMHO.I couldn't get into Gardens of the Moon as much as I wanted to. I just couldn't get an idea what was going on.
i can´t believe nobody yet mentioned "the first Law"trilogy by joe abercrombie. a very nice story and quite a D&D feel to it.
It's odd... But I think it's Erikson's deliberately chosen style to never explain anything. This is hugely disorienting at first, but the whole series becomes very rewarding, IMHO.
You, sir, have impeccable taste. Do me a favor. When you get back to your books, please provide a more thorough suggested reading list. I've already read much of this, and our tastes overlap almost perfectly.
I couldn't get into Gardens of the Moon as much as I wanted to. I just couldn't get an idea what was going on.
I read the book Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss last year and it was my favorite book of the year. Imagine the magical whimsy of Harry Potter but with a real story that flowed and shifted like a George Martin yarn (without all the death and incest).
I get that. Gardens of the Moon was tough to chew through for me as well. The second book, Deadhouse Gates, by FAR the best of the Malazan books in my opinion. A complete out of the park grand slam that has propelled me through the rest of the book and made my "meh" response to Gardens of the Moon worthwhile. Try Deadhouse Gates, it is like a entirely new novel in a barely similar world with only few minor characters from the GotM crossing over.I couldn't get into Gardens of the Moon as much as I wanted to. I just couldn't get an idea what was going on.
I read the book Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss last year and it was my favorite book of the year. Imagine the magical whimsy of Harry Potter but with a real story that flowed and shifted like a George Martin yarn (without all the death and incest).