It's no longer a rumor:
http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/440/440604p1.html?fromint=1
http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/440/440604p1.html?fromint=1
Henry said:OK, think about it logically:
Where's the money to be made - ESPECIALLY if the original sets were "struck" and have to be rebuilt?
Are there indications of a fanbase of sufficient size to sell a 6-episode run of DVD's to? Are there indications of a Farscape movie?
If the supposition is a limited TV series, I don't see a production company ponying up that kind of money to satisfy the terribly unsatisyingly unfinished story arc.
I'm not trying to be cynical, just realistic. If someone has some info on the "show me the money" aspect of this, the rumor would seem a lot mroe solid.
[hijack]2d6 said:"Playing Synnibarr will open avenues in your imagination for which you probably did not even know you had an address" - Bryce Thelen
2d6 said:A mini-series, even if independant from the series might be enough to sell the show into syndication?
There's no set number for syndication numbers. It really depends on the series. For instance, Law & Order: SVU is only on it's fifth season (significantly less than 100 episodes), and it's been in syndication for a while - since this summer at least. I think in general more episodes is better, because it means you can show more episodes per week and not worry about looping through all of the series too quickly. I don't think it's a prerequisite though.CCamfield said:Maaaybe. It depends on how long it would be.
I believe a show needs 100 episodes for syndication. Farscape, with four seasons @ 22 episodes/season (I presume), has 88. So there'd need to be two six-hour miniseries, or one twelve-hour one (which at half of an entire season seems unlikely to happen right away).