Upper_Krust said:I agree with this, what I disagree with is that their realms are literally infinite. Even if they were linked to the entire layer it would take infinite intelligence to be able to process the infinite occurances taking place within an infinite space.
Your point makes little sense anyway. Mephistopheles doesn't control the actions of everyone in his layer either, but he commands them.
Not quite. There is nothing beyond the known parameters of the kosmically localised area. Imagine being on the shore and looking out to the sea, you can still see the horizon but you cannot reach it.
Trying to keep a portal open while you ferry in your entire army is ludicrous. For starters the enemy will be able to intercept in far larger numbers. It will take ages for you to get substantial forces through the gate. The enemy will have plenty of time to disrupt/dispel the gate.
I thought it illustrated the point quite well. To reiterate, the primary layer(s) of the greatest demon monarchs/princes will almost certainly never be threatened by enemy armies EXACTLY LIKE the second world war.
Ruling an infinite layer means they have infinite resources and infinite power.
Its the closest approximation we know.
Unless the superiors, superiors are also there.
Thats exactly the point though - its a matter of frequency. Some planes are so violent that demons are few and far between if any exist there at all, but demons are not going to settle in such areas. They may be chaotic evil, but they are not, as a rule, stupid.
Grover Cleaveland said:Tanar'ri have lower standards for promotion than the perfectionistic, bureaucratic baatezu, so manes will become balors more quickly than lemures become pit fiends, but it's still going to take centuries, or millennia, for it to happen.
BOZ said:true, but i suspect that far fewer manes make it that far compared to lemures making it all the way (percentage-wise), since i have to assume demons are more susceptible to violent death and other unpredictable factors.![]()
Grover Cleaveland said:The Abyssal layers themselves have infinite intelligence - infinitely vast, rather than infinitely smart. Most have animal-level intelligence, though a few are sentient.
Grover Cleaveland said:Abyssal lords, who are tied to their layers spiritually, have the ability to tap into the infinite minds of their layers if they're not busy doing anything else. They're probably not able to process an infinite amount of occurances at once, but their layers are, and their layers inform them of important events (like spellcasters trying to open gates). I don't think Orcus is necessarily instantly aware of Sir Gareth Dragonsbane entering Thanatos from the Plane of Infinite Portals - or of Kiaransalee doing the same - but he has the ability to know such things available to him.
Grover Cleaveland said:Planar rulers rule over infinities, while deities rule over finite regions, which was why the poster who started this particular debate suggested that planar rulers were the more powerful of the two groups. As "rules an infinity" has been the canonical assumption since 1st edition, it's a valid point.
Grover Cleaveland said:The difference is that if Mephistopheles could control everyone in Cania as if they were marrionettes and he was holding the strings, he would do so in a heartbeat. Orcus is a creature of unpredictability, and would soon grow bored and frustrated in such a universe. He likes his animated dead, but skeletons and zombies alone grow tiresome.
Grover Cleaveland said:Weird.
Grover Cleaveland said:The scenario I was suggesting specifically assumed that the gate opened in the infinite space outside the local lord's control. In this case, the enemy wouldn't have any way of knowing about the gate or the invasion - the invader could create its own realm every bit as powerful as the enemy's. That's my problem with assuming infinite wild terrain exists outside an Abyssal ruler's command, which seemed to be your assertion.
Grover Cleaveland said:Grover Cleaveland said:If you assume the layers are finite in size, not just the realms, things are different, but this doesn't seem to be exactly what you're suggesting.
The realms are finite, the layers are infinite.
Grover Cleaveland said:I think I explained why the analogy doesn't work - every layer, or most layers, is equally accessible from the Plain of Infinite Portals - which are filled with enormous, undispellable gates that thousands of demons could pour through at a time.
...and the entry points onto a respective Princes layers are the first thing they guard!
Grover Cleaveland said:There aren't any intermediate layers for the greatest demon monarchs to guard. Orcus can attack (the first layer of) Azzagrat as easily as Graz'zt can attack Thanatos, using the first layer of the Abyss as a staging ground. Naturally they'll have fortresses around most of the major portals, but not an infinite number of them - and even where there are fortresses, they aren't unassailable to a determined foe (just as castles don't necessarily deter invasion in the real world).
Orcus cannot attack Azzagrat as easily as the layer in part controlled by a lord. He has no foothold on Azzagrat with which to mobilise his forces, whereas he can use the part of the layer outside the lords realm as a staging ground, then march enmasse against the lords stronghold.
Grover Cleaveland said:In the same sense that Russia has more oil reserves than Saudi Arabia - they exist, but they're not being exploited to the same degree. The layers are infinite, but they're not infinitely developed. Also, much of the layers might well be empty void, like the regions beyond the land in the layers of Gehenna, or otherwise useless for most purposes. The lords still control them, for all and all of infinity.
The idea of the infinite realm is irrelevant and illogical.
Grover Cleaveland said:I don't see how the amount of time it takes to purge a gelugon of its lower nature relates to how quickly tanar'ri reproduce at all. It might be a guideline for how long it takes a nalfeshnee to become a balor, but that's it.
Its the closest approximation. Its unlikely that a pregnant dretch (perish the thought) carries around its offspring for that length of time.
Grover Cleaveland said:They're placing bets, too. They're a race of chaos - they get too orderly, they die out. Demons don't have a rigid hierarchy in that way, anyway. There are the base demons - the manes, dretches, and rutterkin - commanded by babau, hezrou, chasme, or the like. Their superiors are, in no particular order, the balors, nalfeshnee, and mariliths, who work - sometimes - for the lords and princes of the Abyss. But there's no direct supervision - they're told roughly what to do and they decide how to do it their own way. They're not going to be more rigid than that any more than they're going to start helping sick puppies and children or donating to charity.
The hierarchy is based on power, the strong bully the weak into doing their bidding. If Graz'zt tells Demon Prince 'X' to do something and he in turn commands Demon Lord 'Y' who passes orders down to Balor 'Z' who in turn...etc, etc. If Balor 'Z' disobeys that order and goes off to bet on pregnant dretch mud wrestling, Demon Lord 'Y' is going to skin him alive before he in turn gets repremanded by Demon Prince 'X' who himself is afraid of the wrath of Graz'zt.
Grover Cleaveland said:Some layers of the Abyss are more deadly than others, but even the safest ones are deadly by the standards of the Material Plane.
...and unsurprisingly demons are a lot hardier and tougher than mortals.
Grover Cleaveland said:Unless you know a way of calculating exactlly how deadly the safest place in the Abyss is, you can't claim that demons will be able to reproduce there at a geometric rate.
We know that demons don't gather in overtly hazardous (to them that is, not visitors) areas.
Which means that the only open hostility will come from other demons.
We know that the various realms of the demon lords, princes and so forth are populated by their servants, who don't butcher each other for the sake of it, and theres no precedent for such action in any published material.
Grover Cleaveland said:There a lot of demons. A lot of demons - an uncountable, seemingly endless number. But not so many that it's impossible for the baatezu to defeat them. Part of that's because the war has more to do with belief than numbers - you kill enough, they become demoralized and the whole race weakens. You weaken the forces of Chaos or Evil, the whole race weakens. Take this far enough, and you end up with an entire species too weak to overcome the damage resistance of rival outsider races. They're defeated - they're done. The tanar'ri are thought to have exterminated races in the Abyss before. They destroyed the varrangoin civilization. It can be done.
Of course it can be done, and it doesn't require this ethos grinding you tout, to do it. You are simply having to come up with roundabout ways of dealing with the problems inherant in your 'infinite' demons approach.
Shemeska said:Wee! More debate! More chances to see completely made up words like 'kosmically' used!
Shemeska said:... something like that. *goes back to writing the next Baernaloth cycle story*
Upper_Krust said:I've never heard such a load of nonsense, added to which there is no precedent that every layer is sentient or even semi-sentient.
The planar rulers (and deities) may extend their senses across the realm they control, but its not the layer itself reporting back to them.
'Tap the infinite minds of their layers' - balderdash. You are making that jive up.![]()
...and given that we know such beings are not more powerful than deities (as a rule) and never have been, we can easily poo-poo the idea.
So you are saying that Orcus can control everyone in his realm but the equally powerful Mephisto cannot!? Rubbish.
The idea of the infinite realm is irrelevant and illogical.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.