Ktulu
First Post
I won't play in a bad game. Sure, some sessions can be worse than others, but if the game is truly bad, there's no reason to continue.
However, I think "bad" games often have some other issue behind them. If the DM is truly not very good, he probably shouldn't be the main DM until he's had some practice. If he's not willing to work with the group, then there's no reason to keep him around (if you can't communicate with your friends, then you really shouldn't hang out with them).
I strive, in my games, to be as open as possible. If the players have questions about rules, or critisizms on the game, I do my best to listen and apply those thoughts. I expect the same from my friends. As such, we don't have those issues. It has happened when we've had newcomers to our table, however. In situations where a new person wanted to run a game and it turned out horrible, we've been open about our concerns. If they were taken into consideration, we would continue. When they weren't, we ended the game.
However, I think "bad" games often have some other issue behind them. If the DM is truly not very good, he probably shouldn't be the main DM until he's had some practice. If he's not willing to work with the group, then there's no reason to keep him around (if you can't communicate with your friends, then you really shouldn't hang out with them).
I strive, in my games, to be as open as possible. If the players have questions about rules, or critisizms on the game, I do my best to listen and apply those thoughts. I expect the same from my friends. As such, we don't have those issues. It has happened when we've had newcomers to our table, however. In situations where a new person wanted to run a game and it turned out horrible, we've been open about our concerns. If they were taken into consideration, we would continue. When they weren't, we ended the game.