Sundragon2012
First Post
Joshua Dyal said:Books first. I was reading Edgar Rice Burroughs, Robert E. Howard, J.R.R. Tolkien, Lloyd Alexander, etc. long before I thought of playing D&D.
I think that's still one of my prime dissatisfactions with D&D today, as a matter of fact, that it feels very little like those seminal writings, despite a superficial similarity.
Man, I could not agree more with your dissatisfaction.
With the advent of D&D 3.0 (which I am a fan of) there was a seismic shift away from literary and pulp fantasy to a kind of superhero/videogame fantasy. This is a sense I have and I can't exactly put my finger on it. Well, as an example, the art of the game used to be Elmore, Caldwell, Parkinson, etc. and now except for a few notable exceptions like Todd Lockwood, artists seemed to be comissioned who can make monsters and characters look the best in ridiculous superhero poses.
"Oh look at me....I can kick your ass!" Just dumb and IMO it is an attempt to appear kewl and hip....like with the spiked hair, the spikey armor, the buckles and crap everywhere (look at the idiotic looking sorcerer in the PHB) and the elves who look like bad anime. I am no fan of anime particularly unless the story is strong, but Lidda......what the &$%# where they thinking!
Its like the game's art and feel was developed via polling 13-15yr olds. :\
The books are high quality, no doubt, but the beauty of the art in most cases isn't there. I have not looked at a WoTC Dragon Magazine, Dungeon, adventure or harback book cover that made me think I would love to see that place in real life. Now even though Larry Elmore wasn't the be all and end all of fantasy art, his scenery was often beautiful.
Things will change as those who began with 3.0 get older and their tastes change.
Chris