takasi said:
Next week I may have jury duty. One of the players in our group is a prosecutor (and not surprisingly the biggest rules lawyer you'd ever meet too) and we were talking about jury selection. Prosecutors don't want teachers, defense attorneys don't want ex-law enforcement and no one wants engineers.
He also said that if they ever asked someone their hobbies and they mentioned D&D, they would have no chance at jury duty. So I thought I'd ask here. Has anyone here ever mentioned D&D or another game as their hobby during jury duty selection? What happened?
For those unaware of how juries get selected [and a lawyer might wanna chime in here...]
"Prosecutors don't want teachers" probably refers to the invocation of the teacher as empathetic instructor, wishing for the student to learn and grow. A prosecutor wants to win, wants the jury to convict, wants the defendant to lose. Someone in a profession perceived to involve empathy does not fit with their agenda.
"defense attorneys don't want ex-law enforcement" because they don't want a conviction. Law enforcement professionals deal with crime everyday and may have a bias to 1/ presume guilt or 2/ see the facts of the case and recognize guilt. Defense attorneys work to ensure their clients are not found guilty or responsible, so having people who might see through legal obfuscation does not fit their agenda.
"no one wants engineers" or anyone with a science background. Scientists, engineers, the well-educated are trained to weigh facts and make decisions based on evidence. In a perfect world, these SHOULD be the sort of people we all want on juries in order to ensure fair and just trials. But, well, that damn scientific method can get in the way of convictions, mistrials, and emotional pleas of innocence. It is said that the OJ jury was compiled of people who had no higher than an 8th grade science background. In a case that depended on an understanding of forensic science, that might explain the outcome.
Now D&D players...well, we're all thought to be anarchical freaks with tenuous grasps on reality. If a trial is high-profile, this hobby can be exploited to make the trial and its outcome a farce in the media.