ishalleatyourflesh
First Post
your ac would drop to 22? mine's 24 if i could drop it i would, i'm going to get hit any way might as well get a bonus from it
Can you update the IC on weather the charge attack hits and how much damage it deals to Rho, and with the visible damage on all the enemies please? I can't choose the best course of action for Silivrenniel without this info.
Yes exactly my point! He would have just stood there, drooling. But in a much less threatening form! Plus i don't know if it won't remove his spell all together:i doubt he would have turned back since he's feebleminded right now.
Seems to me it acts much like Dispel Magic, only more specific and no save or SR allowed...Each version of this spell can target one of the hazards described below and “correct” it in the manner described. Unless specifically stated otherwise, this spell affects magical and mundane hazards of the indicated type equally. For example, a ruby ray of reversal can eliminate the webs of a monstrous spider or the effect of a web spell.
I hate DM's that specifically try to do stuff like that, and I sincerely hope you learn better early on in your DMing career.. The point of DMing is to provide interesting, challenging encounters - not kick the crap out of your PCs. If I wanted to be a prick and use all the douchebag tactics that my roommates and I joke about, I've no doubt that Rho by himself could kill half this party, but I don't see how anybody would have fun from said encounter.. That doesn't mean that I'm holding back, it just means I'm not being an ass. There is a difference.Then again, i am grateful for Jemal not targeting my mage (probably because he knows i'm fresh as a player). If i were the DM i'd run highly experienced NPCs to the best possible tactics available. In this case, not spreading damage between 6 PCs and definitely not attacking the high HP tanks when there is a 180HP mage there with virtually no AC, that is flinging Meteor Swarms and Admixtured Cones of Cold.
*L* trust me with all the ways I've forgotten to kill you guys and the defenses I've forgotten to take into account on my NPC's(Rho in particular I keep forgetting his greater blink), you should be very glad that I don't go back on allready posted actions.Oh, and in case you were wanting those rolls: Condensed Three Round Grapple Attack (1d20+29=41, 21d10+63d6+420=742). Just be glad I didn't power Attack 20 and drop his AC 20. If I did that'd be 1,162 damage, but his AC drops to 22 for the round.
The problem is, It says "without penalty and without first making a grapple check".. I can only presume that they are referring to the ony actual 'penalty' reffered to in the grapple section about attacks: Attacks in a grapple suffer a -4 penalty. Yes, only being able to wield light weapons in a grapple is "A Penalty", but then again, so is having your weapon broken.. or facing someone immune to sneak attack(If you happen to have sneak attack). If you allow a braoder definition of penalty than the actual listed "Penalty", a rules lawyer could and would use said terminology to overcome many things when grappled that are clearly not in the intent of the feat... Damage Reduction, Hold Person, being disarmed, etc, etc."You can wield your weapon against a foe who grapples you without penalty and without first making a grapple check. In this situation, you can take a standard action or a full attack action as normal."
The way I read this is that no matter what weapon you have this feat in, be it a Dagger or even a Spiked Chain, you can use it without hindrance if you are grappled, whether it's light or not. I might even stretch it to the point where Adamas could even Two-Weapon fight with two Bastard Swords.