D&D 5E Goblinoids in D&D 5e: Their Origin, Story, and Tragedy (+)

For much of D&D's history, it has had plenty of races whose whole identities and stories basically revolved around them being always-evil villainous humanoid mooks that the players can kill without having to deal with any sort of moral ramifications for mass-murdering them (Point 1 of evidence). Among the most iconic of these in the game are Orcs and Goblinoids, both heavily influenced by their depictions in J.R.R. Tokien's stories in Middle Earth (the Hobbit, the Lord of the Rings, the Silmarillion). Both of these creatures have roots in European folklore that Tolkien took inspiration from and adapted to fit his world and the stories he wanted to tell with it. When Gary Gygax was creating Dungeons and Dragons, he "borrowed" many creatures (Hobbits, Balrogs, Orcs, Goblins/Hobgoblins, Ents, Elves, and many others) from J.R.R. Tolkien's works and plopped them straight into the D&D Multiverse with barely a second thought. Due to the process that Goblinoids got inserted into D&D, as well as decades of clinging to tradition and Tolkien's works, Goblinoids have deviated little in the core lore of D&D from the (misinterpreted) Tolkien-version of them, aside from the addition of Bugbears to the Goblin/Hobgoblin duo and a small pantheon of minor gods that rule the Goblinoids.

4D9B0488-0215-41AC-8B12-D119661108D1.png


(Edit: I just want to add a note that Goblins and Hobgoblins in Middle Earth were actually just Orcs. Many people have misinterpreted their inclusion in the Hobbit as them being an entirely separate race from Orcs, which is likely where the D&D version of Goblins and Hobgoblins got their roots. "Goblin" was just a human name for the Orcs, and "Hobgoblins" were a larger breed of Goblins, probably being the Uruk-Hai or a different breed of Orcs that is larger than the typical. However, this understandably has caused a lot of confusion over the years, especially because Goblins and Hobgoblins are different from Orcs in the Hobbit movies.)

Recently, this has changed. 5e has quite a bit of information about Goblinoids in the Monster Manual and Volo's Guide to Monsters, and now Mordenkainen Presents: Monsters of the Multiverse, that show what the true colors of these three races and their overall story in the base D&D Multiverse. Now, this is quite a big story, so I'll give you a hint: the Goblinoids are actually the victims in the D&D Multiverse. They're quite possibly the single most victimized race/group of races in the D&D Multiverse (only being surpassed by the Duergar).

I recognize that this is quite a big claim, and that I have a lot of heavy lifting to do to convince many of you of this, so let's get started.

What, Precisely, is a "Goblinoid"?​

Here we are, don't turn away now
We are the goblins that razed this town
Here we are, don't turn away now
We are the goblins that razed this town . . . to dust


Goblinoids in D&D 5e are a group of "monstrous" humanoid races ruled over by Maglubiyet, a tyrannical, warmongering god that seeks to conquer every other race and become the king of the gods (pretty stereotypical for an evil conqueror god, but it works). So far in 5e, there are only three races that are classified as "Goblinoids"; the Goblins (duh), Hobgoblins (also duh), and Bugbears. In previous editions there were even more races of Goblinoids, such as the Bakemono, Varag, Dekanter Goblins, and a few others (Orcs and Kobolds were even classified as Goblinoids at some point), but 5e mostly focuses on these three main goblinoids, with very few exceptions (Verdan, Koalinths, Norkers, Barghests).

The main reason for there being 3 different main variations of Goblinoids in D&D 5e is almost undoubtedly due to them filling all of the types of evil alignments perfectly (Goblins as Neutral Evil, Hobgoblins as Lawful Evil, Bugbears as Chaotic Evil), but there also is a folklore justification for them being classified similarly (all of them were meddlesome fey house spirits with similar descriptions and behaviors).

While the different goblinoid races in the folklore (and many others) had notable similarities that would make one assume that the creatures were related, D&D's takes on these monsters doesn't tend to share these links. Goblins are tricksy cowards and constant liars, Hobgoblins are disciplined and militaristic warlords, and Bugbears are savage Sasquatch-like humanoids with primal characteristics and uncannily long limbs. Besides the naming similarities between Goblins and Hobgoblins, there's really not much between these different races to make someone assume that they're all that closely related. And this is actually justified in D&D 5e's lore. Volo's Guide to Monsters says the following:
Maglubiyet is truly the Conquering God. He stiffens the spines of cowardly goblins. He rouses bugbears from their lazy slumber. He sets the thunderous step of hobgoblin legions. Maglubiyet takes three races and turns them into one people.

In bygone times the goblinoids were distinct from one another, with separate faiths and different customs. Then Maglubiyet came and conquered all who stood before him, mortals and deities alike. Gods and heroes who wouldn’t bend to his will were broken and discarded. He put his foot on the neck of mighty Khurgorbaeyag, bound the will of intractable Hruggek, and forced sadistic Nomog-Geaya to fall in line. What the goblins, the bugbears, and the hobgoblins were before their gods bowed to Maglubiyet no longer matters. Now they are, first of all, followers of Maglubiyet.
(emphasis mine)

As we can see here, a "Goblinoid" is just the name applied to the loosely-related races of people that Maglubiyet has (so far) conquered and assimilated into one culture and people. All of the three different Goblinoid races have distinct ancestries, Maglubiyet just managed to kill most of their previous pantheons, take control of the gods from these old pantheons that survived, and dominate the cultures of these three different races in order to force them to serve his will. And Maglubiyet has not stopped his conquest, he is continuing his wars with other gods in Acheron where he's trying to conquer the Orcish pantheon and take control of the Orcs that follow Gruumsh. It is possible that if Maglubiyet succeeds in his conquest of the Orcish Pantheon that the Orcs will become the fourth major race to be classified as a "Goblinoid", but (thankfully) for now, Orcs are not numbered among Maglubiyet's mortal ranks.

Who Were the Goblinoids Before Maglubiyet Conquered Them?​

If it hadn't been for Goblin-Eye Joe
I'd been married long time ago
Where did you come from, where did you go?

Where did you come from, Goblin-Eye Joe?

Apparently they were Fey (taking a note from the folklore, for once). With the recent mechanical changes to the Goblinoid races from Mordenkainen Presents: Monsters of the Multiverse, it has become canon due to their added Fey Ancestry trait that all three of the Goblinoid races are descended from Fey, similarly to Elves. This adds a lot to their origins that we previously did not know anything about. Apparently Volo was lying when he said "what [the Goblinoids] were before their gods bowed to Maglubiyet no longer matters", because the fact that the Goblinoids have ancestral roots in the Feywild is quite important to them, both mechanically and lore-wise.

Now that we've answered what creature type they were before becoming the Goblinoids, we need to answer another question: what type of Fey they were? To me, the answer is clearly Unseelie, because the distinction between the two Fey Courts generally falls into "If they're pretty, they're Seelie, if they're ugly, they're Unseelie", making the all of the Goblinoid races fall pretty easily into having ancestors from the Unseelie Fey. Now, there is more to being an Unseelie Fey than just being ugly, but most of the other notable traits of the Unseelie Fey (excessively cruel, slavers, malicious pranksters) also match up well with what we know of Goblinoids.

Furthermore, while this was almost definitely not intentional, there are way more Seelie Archfey that have been named in D&D products than Unseelie (this also predates 5e). There's Queen Titania, King Oberon, their three Daughters of Delight (that were corrupted by the Prince of Frost, but still count), Nathair, Skerrit, Verenestra, Damh, and more. For the Unseelie Archfey, there's only the Queen of Air and Darkness and Nintra Siotta (there's a few others that might be in the court, but aren't explicitly stated to be, like Baba Yaga, the Prince of Frost, and Neifion). With so few Unseelie Archfey listed, one has to question "why?", and the Goblinoids possibly having roots in the Unseelie Court provides an in-universe answer to that. Maglubiyet killed them. If the Goblinoids used to be their own races, members of the various types of Fey in the Feywild, followers of the Unseelie Court's Archfey, and we combine that with what we know of how Maglubiyet conquered the Goblinoids . . . it's pretty clear what happened to the rest of the Unseelie Archfey.

Maglubiyet killed most of them, and adopted the few survivors that defected into his own pantheon. If this were true, Khurgorbaeyag (the sole survivor of the old Goblin pantheon), Hruggek and Grankhul (the last two gods of the old Bugbear pantheon), Nomog-Geaya, and Bargrivyek (the only two survivors of the old Hobgoblin pantheon), and possibly even Maglubiyet, all used to be Archfey of the Unseelie Court.

Side Note: We know of precisely one god from the old Goblinoid pantheons that Maglubiyet killed; the prankster spirit that is the vestige of a former Goblin god of trickery that creates Nilbogs. We don't know their name, but know that they were a god of trickery, are now a vestige that can possess any goblin, but chooses only the most unhinged/unruly goblins in its clan, and is trying to cause disorder and chaos amongst Maglubiyet's ranks to get back for his conquest of the original Goblin pantheon. This god sound a lot like an Archfey, being a chaotic trickster spirit out for revenge against another that has wronged them. Maglubiyet is Lawful Evil and despises chaos, and Archfey are notable for their chaotic behavior, which further explains why Maglubiyet left so few members of the previous pantheons of the Goblinoids alive (and also why he now wants to conquer the Orcs, who are known for being Chaotic Evil).

As a summary, the Goblinoids were probably Fey of the Unseelie Court before Maglubiyet came in, murdered their pantheons (the Unseelie Archfey), completely changed their culture and nature (turning them into humanoids as a way to "tame" them and get the more chaotic elements from their fey nature out of them), and turned them into a minions that he uses in his battle against the Orcs and their pantheon to try and conquer and "tame" even more races.

(The names of the different races also probably changed from the time that they were Fey to the present day, due to Maglubiyet erasing their cultural heritage and changing their fundamental nature. I personally use "Gremlin" as the fey version of Goblins, "Hob" for the fey version of Hobgoblins, and "Boggart" for the fey version of Bugbears, but none of this is supported in any official 5e books and is purely my own headcanon.)

How Does Maglubiyet Treat the Goblinoids?​

You're my biggest fan
You'll follow me until you love me
Goblin-Goblin Nazis
Baby, there's no other pantheons
I know that you'll be
My Goblin-Goblin Nazis


Long story short: not well. While some of the goblinoids are definitely treated better than others (Hobgoblins when compared to the lowly Goblins), the centuries of brainwashing, eugenics, and cultural genocide that all of the Goblinoid races have undergone have resulted in their society being . . . a bit extreme. If you want a more in-depth description of how it functions, you can go read their section in Volo's Guide to Monsters, but this is the basics of how each race in the Goblinoid family is treated in the culture Maglubiyet has fostered for them:
  • Goblins are taught that the world is a place where you have to take advantage of others, or you will be taken advantage of. They're oppressed by the Hobgoblins and sometimes by lazy Bugbears, and this has created a cycle of oppression in their caste system, where they're constantly being oppressed, while also oppressing others below them in status (including their slaves and pets). Because they're constantly being beaten, robbed, mocked, and excluded, they do all of those same things to their pets (which makes them super vicious), to their slaves (which is extremely traumatizing to any survivors of being enslaved by goblins), and other goblins that are lower in station.
  • Bugbears aren't built for long periods of exertion, don't have many children, and basically have to hibernate every now and then, so most people think that they're lazy. Due to this, they live in tribes, similar to many animals, and are basically just ambush predators in humanoid form. Their two gods are of bravery/power and stealth/watchfulness, and they believe that murder is a holy tradition, and also believe that any bugbear that shows signs of cowardice is being possessed by "the Bogeyman", and shun any members of their tribes that have "betrayed their gods" by running away from a losing battle, or something along those lines.
  • Hobgoblins are taught that their only purpose in life is to be pawns in Maglubiyet's war against the Orcish Pantheon (which is true from a certain point of view, because Maglubiyet would have killed them all if he couldn't make use of them), and are extremely militaristic due to this. They're (culturally) like a mix of Nazis and Romans, and for some reason also Samurai/Ninjas, focusing mainly on honor, which they believe can only be achieved on the battlefield. They don't see the point in any of the arts (because they can't give them "honor"), believe that their individual lives do not matter (only their wars do), and have a strict hierarchical caste system that, you guessed it, entirely revolves around how accomplished they are on the battlefield.
. . . That's all not great. They're trained to believe that this is the best that life can give them, and centuries of this propaganda and brainwashing have made there be very few insurgent goblinoids, to the point where basically every other humanoid race in the core of D&D considers them to be irredeemable monsters that want to kill/enslave all of them, and treats them accordingly. They're the victims of being taken out of their previous lives, having their gods killed, and being used as pawns in an eternal war between their conqueror and every other god in every pantheon, basically turning from natural spirits of the Feywild into fantasy Nazis.

The Tragedy of 5e's Goblinoids . . . the Wise​

We walk a lonely road
The only one that we have ever known
We know where it goes

And it's home to us, but we walk alone

I think it's been made pretty clear throughout this post that the Goblinoids in D&D 5e's base lore are victims, but let's recap just to make it obvious. Here's the steps of what it took to get the Goblinoids into the state that they are now.
  1. They were Fey, probably of the Unseelie Court, that lived in the Feywild and embodied many different ideals (trickery for Goblins, the laws of nature for Hobgoblins, the primal ferocity of nature for Bugbears). They had their own cultures, traditions, religions, and whole pantheons of what were probably the Unseelie Archfey that they worshipped.
  2. Maglubiyet came from somewhere and began conquering their pantheons, killing their gods, and probably many of their population that lived in the Feywild. He eventually won the war, converted a handful of their former gods to his side, and makes the Goblinoids form a mass exodus from the Feywild into the Material Plane.
  3. In order to perfect his new "children", Maglubiyet spends centuries of eugenics, brainwashing, and spreading propaganda to turn Goblinoids from natural fey spirits into the "monstrous" humanoids that they are today, killing any that rebel and making them lose their Fey nature to try and cut off all of their ancestral roots to their previous cultures and pantheons.
  4. Maglubiyet tries to conquer the Orcs and their pantheon, igniting an eternal war in Acheron where dead Goblinoids and Orcs will forever fight against one another in an attempt to add another race of people into his flock and continue his crusade of becoming the ruler of all the gods in the D&D Multiverse.
  5. Due to this brainwashing and conditioning to his idea of a perfect world, nearly every other race in all of the D&D Multiverse shuns the Goblinoids and treats them as irredeemable monsters to be exterminated.
  6. Not only are Goblinoids rejected by every other race on the Material Plane, but they also oppress one another and are restrained by extraordinarily restrictive cultures in order to keep them under the control of Maglubiyet.
. . . That's a pretty tragic story, if you ask me. They're probably the single most victimized race (or group of races) in all of D&D 5e's core lore (possibly being surpassed by the Duergar), and are almost universally hated in the D&D Multiverse. They're stuck fighting an eternal war for an oppressive god that killed their own gods and genetically manipulated them to better serve his will, and they themselves don't even know their origins. It's sad and awful what has been done to them in-game, especially because they're pretty interesting creatures, and I'm sure that whatever their Fey cultures/pantheons were like were interesting, as well.

What are your thoughts? Did I get anything wrong (in the context of D&D 5e's lore)? Does anyone have something to add to this? Or do any of you already use a story like this?

Keep in mind that this is a (+) thread. This is not a thread to debate the ethics of killing Goblinoids, or ranting about how you hate the changes to Goblinoids in 5e, or otherwise going against the grain. I'm not saying that you have to use this story at all, this was just an analysis of their lore in 5e so far and pointing out how they're actually the victims here, in the context of 5e's lore about them. This is pretty setting-specific, but it works in any world that has Maglubiyet (or Bane for the Dawn War Pantheon could work as a replacement), the Goblinoid family of races, and an original plane for Fey. Feel free to ignore/use anything from this that you want, as well as to comment anything constructive that you think could add to the discussion.

Have a good day, and apologies for the awful song parodies.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Lyxen

Great Old One
I agree that if they are doing evil things, it doesn't matter at all how tragic their story is, they have to be stopped, one way or the others. Dracula from the Castlevania TV Show is an extremely tragic character, but he still has to die for the betterment of the world. The same thing applies here. It also does hint that if they are capable of being corrupted, they can also be redeemed.

For an adventure focusing around that, it depends on the world, but I would probably have it revolve around the players trying to find some way to kill/imprison Maglubiyet (or Bane, if you're using the Dawn War Pantheon with this same story just pasted on that one god), or having the party somehow discover the origins of the Goblinoid peoples and revealing the truth of their heritage to them in order to instill a rebellion against Maglubiyet.

The party could even become allies with Gruumsh-worshipping Orcs in order to overthrow Maglubiyet in Acheron, or have to make deals with Archfey in the Feywild (or possibly Vecna) in order to learn the secret nature of the Goblinoid's history.

Or, if the goblins are cursed to follow Maglubiyet (similarly to how they're cursed by Bane in Exandria), the party could set out to find a MacGuffin (a magic item, or spell, or creature) that can break this curse, possibly even restoring the Goblinoids tainted by Maglubiyet back to their original feyish forms.

If doing an AP, it would probably have to include a lot of steps, maybe Maglubiyet used various means to corrupt goblins, including his own hierarch that need to be removed, etc.

And maybe, in a plot twist, you could find out that Maglubiyet was not responsible, it was a faction of goblins who were tired of being the lesser feys who invoked him and gave him enough reins so that he could take over.

And maybe even those goblins were manipulated by an arch-fey who tried to machiavel them as tools in a petty feud against another arch-fey, and whose plot slipped through his fingers, and is really afraid that it could be found out as the ultimate responsible for the situation.

And maybe even he was manipulated by his former mistress, etc...
 

log in or register to remove this ad

S'mon

Legend
I'm not generally keen on huge dollops of official lore, as it tends to get in the way of what I want to do (esp when my son complains I'm deviating from canon!), but I may use some of this at least in some settings. I like how it makes sense of Maglubiyet vs Gruumsh dating from back in 1e.

I've used goblins as oppressed by hobgoblins (and freeable/redeemable); I've also used hobgoblins as half-goblins, created by goblins breeding with captured humans. Sometimes a bugbear is just a really old and well fed goblin, as a troll is the male offspring of a hag (as per Grendel). I like to keep it flexible.
 

Great work here. Casts Maglubiyet in a very Sauron/Morgoth sort of light. It would be nice to see these ideas developed further in a release. I agree with the notion that while goblins come from a history of victimhood, because they have responded to it by victimizing others, fighting and even killing them is justified. It does leave open the door for stories of individual or even groups of goblins seeking a new way. As for why go all in on fighting Orcs, I envision Maglubiyet as a prideful deity. The sort who doesn't like to lose. My personal lore would be that Orcs were just the first peoples that Maglubiyet attempted to conquer after forming the Goblin peoples, was handed defeats for his troubles, and just can't help but keep doubling down out of bloody mindedness.
 


I'm just going to point out that this is specific terminology is only used in D&D 4e. 5e does not have Exarchs or Chosen (yet), and Bane hasn't been stated to ever having any sort of control over Maglubiyet in any official D&D 5e books.

Bawhahaha, did you read the SCAG and Sundering series of novels, there are TONS of Chosen in 5e, although they don't use Exarch, which was just a confusing 4e word for Demigod in 4e.

Speaking of the Sundering, it's brought by all kinds of Gods that had been dead or MIA back to life, so the Overgod AO could bring back dead Fey none Evil Gobliniod Gods back to life too and that would explain the sudden remergence of fey like traits in some Gobliniods all of a sudden.

Whoever writes the Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide for 5.5e is going to have their work cut out for them, especially for the none human races.
 


DarkMantle

Explorer
. . . That's a pretty tragic story, if you ask me. They're probably the single most victimized race (or group of races) in all of D&D 5e's core lore (possibly being surpassed by the Duergar), and are almost universally hated in the D&D Multiverse. They're stuck fighting an eternal war for an oppressive god that killed their own gods and genetically manipulated them to better serve his will, and they themselves don't even know their origins. It's sad and awful what has been done to them in-game, especially because they're pretty interesting creatures, and I'm sure that whatever their Fey cultures/pantheons were like were interesting, as well.

What are your thoughts? Did I get anything wrong (in the context of D&D 5e's lore)? Does anyone have something to add to this? Or do any of you already use a story like this?

My thoughts is that you deserve an accolade, because:
  • You've looked past all the complaining and arguing that have no productive end goal in sight
  • You really thought it through: you made the time and effort to ideate and come up with a creative solution
  • Your story is well-written
  • Your story adds to D&D lore and enriches it, rather than detracting from it
I don't think I could have found the time to come up with something like that, and I think your efforts should be given the highest kudos
 


Faolyn

(she/her)
The way I look at it/explained it, lorewise, is that when The Dead Three all died at some point, Maglubiyet saw that he no longer had to be an Exarch of Bane because all of a sudden, his job position had no boss to rein him in or order him around.

Basically, you take out the Orcs, especially Gruumsh, and a whole lotta peeps are gonna think twice about messing with you/taking your territory/whatever else.
He's also a former Exarch of Bane. (Exarches are basically almost the right hand of a deity, with a Chosen being below that.)
This is why WotC has decided that they can officially ignore canon--because they were already ignoring canon. In 2e Planescape, it was canon that Magbluiyet (and other nonhuman deities) were technically more powerful than the Realms' human gods because they were worshiped in many spheres, while the gods of the Realms (and Greyhawk and Dragonlance) were only single-sphere powers. Maggie and the other goblinoid gods are worshiped in both the Realms and Greyhawk, and are considered the default D&D deities in homebrew games as well.

If anything, Bane should've been an exarch of Maglubiyet!
 

Sacrosanct

Legend
Publisher
When I found myself reading a long essay, I had to scroll up and see if the OP was @Snarf Zagyg 😂

But seriously, I like a lot of how you interpreted things. One thing I never understood was how DnD handled bugbears. They are not like the others in folklore. In folklore, they are actual ghostly bears that feed off of the fear of others. They aren't humanoid at all.

I can only assume they got the kobold treatment, and something was lost in translation from folklore to DnD
 


This is why WotC has decided that they can officially ignore canon--because they were already ignoring canon. In 2e Planescape, it was canon that Magbluiyet (and other nonhuman deities) were technically more powerful than the Realms' human gods because they were worshiped in many spheres, while the gods of the Realms (and Greyhawk and Dragonlance) were only single-sphere powers. Maggie and the other goblinoid gods are worshiped in both the Realms and Greyhawk, and are considered the default D&D deities in homebrew games as well.

If anything, Bane should've been an exarch of Maglubiyet!
Did not know that actually. Interesting.
 

Tonguez

A suffusion of yellow
When I found myself reading a long essay, I had to scroll up and see if the OP was @Snarf Zagyg 😂

But seriously, I like a lot of how you interpreted things. One thing I never understood was how DnD handled bugbears. They are not like the others in folklore. In folklore, they are actual ghostly bears that feed off of the fear of others. They aren't humanoid at all.

I can only assume they got the kobold treatment, and something was lost in translation from folklore to DnD
In 1e they were described as giant-goblins and are a ogre parallel. I suppose the name was just because they were hairy and had claws ‘like a bear’ so the old Bugbear name was snatched from folklore.
The Folkloric term bug is a version of Bogey so bogey-bear just means ‘scary monster’
 

AcererakTriple6

Autistic DM (he/him)
Bawhahaha, did you read the SCAG and Sundering series of novels, there are TONS of Chosen in 5e, although they don't use Exarch, which was just a confusing 4e word for Demigod in 4e.
I have read the SCAG. Haven't read any Forgotten Realms novels (besides the first 9 Drizzt novels), though. Maybe I'm remembering wrong, but it doesn't use the terminology of "Chosen" anywhere. The only 5e book that does is Tales from the Yawning Portal, in the Dead in Thay adventure.

Edit: Just a correction, @Henadic Theologian was right. The SCAG does mention Chosen.
Speaking of the Sundering, it's brought by all kinds of Gods that had been dead or MIA back to life, so the Overgod AO could bring back dead Fey none Evil Gobliniod Gods back to life too and that would explain the sudden remergence of fey like traits in some Gobliniods all of a sudden.
I don't expect that to happen. The Sundering didn't bring back Karsus (when he was briefly the god of magic), any of the previous iterations of Mystra/Mystril, and many other gods that have been dead from pre-Spellplague times.

It could be an interesting idea if this was a campaign plot, but I don't think that WotC will do anything like this.
 
Last edited:

I have read the SCAG. Haven't read any Forgotten Realms novels (besides the first 9 Drizzt novels), though. Maybe I'm remembering wrong, but it doesn't use the terminology of "Chosen" anywhere. The only 5e book that does is Tales from the Yawning Portal, in the Dead in Thay adventure.

I don't expect that to happen. The Sundering didn't bring back Karsus (when he was briefly the god of magic), any of the previous iterations of Mystra/Mystril, and many other gods that have been dead from pre-Spellplague times.

It could be an interesting idea if this was a campaign plot, but I don't think that WotC will do anything like this.

You are remembering wrong, the SCAG does use the term Chosen, the Chosen are a huge part of the Sundering. And the quasi 5e adventures like Murder in Baldur's Gate use the term Chosen as well.
 

AcererakTriple6

Autistic DM (he/him)
You are remembering wrong, the SCAG does use the term Chosen, the Chosen are a huge part of the Sundering. And the quasi 5e adventures like Murder in Baldur's Gate use the term Chosen as well.
Just checked. You're right, it does mention the Chosen. Apologies for the mistake. (The main point about Exarchs not existing in 5e is still accurate, though.)
 

AcererakTriple6

Autistic DM (he/him)
So are you going to cover the origin of another race? You mentioned the Gnolls. It would be neat to see how the Gnolls or even the Minotaurs came to be.
Sorry for the late reply. I saw this last night, but forgot to reply until now.

It is possible that I'll do similar articles to this one in the future. If I do, the next one will probably be about Orcs or Duergar, but I might eventually get to Minotaurs or Gnolls (Gnolls in 5e are a bit tricky to do this sort of article for, as they're basically just demons in flesh-suits).

I do have a few threads in a fairly similar format to this one on a few different topics, but many of them involve much more speculation and homebrew than this one. However, if you or others that enjoyed this one would like to check them out, here they are:

 
Last edited:

Faolyn

(she/her)
Yep! I addressed this here:
Wow, I completely missed that. Sorry.

That is interesting. That does fit well with the idea that Maglubiyet is trying to suppress the Fey Ancestry of the Goblinoid races, as the Feywild is a plane of emotions and he doesn't want them to know where they came from (because that would give them an identity beyond being his servants, which could lead to them realizing how awful he is and revolting).
That might depend on what sort of fey the goblins were. They were quite probably Unseelie, and while Unseelie doesn't automatically equal evil, it does so much of the time. (My personal take on fey is: fey see humanoids as animals. Seelie see humanoids as beloved pets, or as exotic menagerie animals, to be treated well and coddled; Unseelie see them as prey animals, or as lab rats. I run horror, mostly; can you tell?) Changing fey to goblins may therefore have been more of a lateral move, in terms of personality.

Perhaps if they were still fey, they'd be beholden to greater fey laws (you know the type: can't lie or can only lie, can be bound by contracts, subjected to protection from evil and good, etc.), which is what Maglubiyet here wanted to avoid. Or it could be that changing their creature type was an unintended side effect of whatever else Maggie did to them--just because he's a god, it doesn't mean that he's actually good at what he's doing.

But anyway, if they were already Unseelie, then I'm not 100% sure that having emotions would be enough to make them hate him, especially since it's only the hobgoblins who don't show emotions--goblins, bugbears, et al are fine with them. That being said--assuming the prohibition against showing emotions does come from on high--it could be that this is just a power play on Maggie's part. A cultist type thing: get the followers to shun a basic, natural thing, and they effectively exclude themselves from outside society.

Second suggestion, maybe he already has gone after other races (besides the Goblinoid races). We know that Maglubiyet gives those that he conquers two options; joining his side or death. Maybe he has tried to conquer some other races/gods before, but all of them would rather die than "turn to the dark side". This could make for a cool story in a setting, where there's a few extinct races and pantheons from centuries ago that are revealed to be results of Maglubiyet's conquest of other deities.
Or perhaps he's conquered another race and turned them into goblinoids. We haven't seen atomies or grigs in 5e yet, have we? That's because Maglubiyet turned them all into tasloi.

I personally am a fan of the idea of Maglubiyet planning to use his same eugenics/artificial selection process on the Orcs to produce a line of "supersoldiers". Maybe he just needs to conquer the Orcs, spend a century or two brainwashing them to his side, and then he will have enough power to take on any/every other race in the D&D Multiverse?
I'm less fond of this idea, but for completely meta-reasons: I find I dislike it when there are "advanced" versions of races that were clearly made only so that there could be higher-level fights using the same creatures, even if it doesn't make sense in-universe. This was endemic in the 3x MMs, like when they had all those weirdly mutated chromatic dragonspawn-things created by Tiamat, even though the idea of her creating such things is bizarre to me.
 


AcererakTriple6

Autistic DM (he/him)
Wow, I completely missed that. Sorry.
No problem. It's a big post, and it was just a passing mention. In case you want to read more about how I'd approach some of them, @JEB asked how I would incorporate them into this story, and I responded in this post.
That might depend on what sort of fey the goblins were. They were quite probably Unseelie, and while Unseelie doesn't automatically equal evil, it does so much of the time. (My personal take on fey is: fey see humanoids as animals. Seelie see humanoids as beloved pets, or as exotic menagerie animals, to be treated well and coddled; Unseelie see them as prey animals, or as lab rats. I run horror, mostly; can you tell?) Changing fey to goblins may therefore have been more of a lateral move, in terms of personality.
I really like this. I might steal it. It also fits how Goblins treat their own pets and slaves.
Perhaps if they were still fey, they'd be beholden to greater fey laws (you know the type: can't lie or can only lie, can be bound by contracts, subjected to protection from evil and good, etc.), which is what Maglubiyet here wanted to avoid. Or it could be that changing their creature type was an unintended side effect of whatever else Maggie did to them--just because he's a god, it doesn't mean that he's actually good at what he's doing.

But anyway, if they were already Unseelie, then I'm not 100% sure that having emotions would be enough to make them hate him, especially since it's only the hobgoblins who don't show emotions--goblins, bugbears, et al are fine with them. That being said--assuming the prohibition against showing emotions does come from on high--it could be that this is just a power play on Maggie's part. A cultist type thing: get the followers to shun a basic, natural thing, and they effectively exclude themselves from outside society.
I fully agree here. Equating how Maglubiyet has designed Goblinoid culture and how many cults act is a nice analogy. I agree that while Maglubiyet may have intended to make certain changes to the Goblinoid nature, he wasn't perfect, and there's still vestiges of their ancestry in the genetics (Fey Ancestry, for example) and behavior (Goblins being whimsy, Hobgoblins having ties to the Rules of the Feywild in their culture, Bugbears having a bogeyman figure in their mythology, etc).
Or perhaps he's conquered another race and turned them into goblinoids. We haven't seen atomies or grigs in 5e yet, have we? That's because Maglubiyet turned them all into tasloi.
Yep. That could work, too. (We have not seen Atomies or Grigs in 5e, as far as I'm aware.)
I'm less fond of this idea, but for completely meta-reasons: I find I dislike it when there are "advanced" versions of races that were clearly made only so that there could be higher-level fights using the same creatures, even if it doesn't make sense in-universe. This was endemic in the 3x MMs, like when they had all those weirdly mutated chromatic dragonspawn-things created by Tiamat, even though the idea of her creating such things is bizarre to me.
Totally understandable.
 

Visit Our Sponsor

Latest threads

Level Up!

An Advertisement

Advertisement4

Top