Heh, well you said 'Basic' D&D and gave us the image of basic D&D... and to me species like Tritons, Genasi, and Tabaxi or classes like Bards, Warlocks, and Monks aren't basic, they're anything but. If the question was truly just a 'What's your Top 5 classes and species?' list, couching it in different terms than 'basic D&D' might have yielded different results.You guys are thinking to much about what boils down to a "pick your top 5 races and classes" list.
You could just read the post.Heh, well you said 'Basic' D&D and gave us the image of basic D&D... and to me species like Tritons, Genasi, and Tabaxi or classes like Bards, Warlocks, and Monks aren't basic, they're anything but. If the question was truly just a 'What's your Top 5 classes and species?' list, couching it in different terms than 'basic D&D' might have yielded different results.![]()
I really wish they would, but splats keep the lights on.Just for funsies, let's say WotC is going to put out a 2nd line of D&D that trims things to the bone. A simpler streamlined version of D&D with hopes that players will one day ADVANCE to the full game.
For classes fighter, rogue, and warlock twice. You don't need a fourth or fifth class. The rest are variations on those. And yes, warlock instead of cleric or wizard. This is a new, streamlined basic 5E, right? Subclasses would be...not included in something that's properly basic. I think even auto-picking a subclass and applying it is too much. But going with the premise that's battlemaster for fighter, thief for rogue, and both fiend and celestial for warlock. The warlock fills your typical cleric and wizard slots.The book will have 5 races/species/whatever and 5 classes. And before anyone says anything yes I am aware that in old Basic there as just classes as Elf was a class and Dwarf was a class etc, but just go with me on this.
Out of the whole of 5E D&D what would you like to see as the Basic Core Races and Classes?