Urriak Uruk
Gaming is fun, and fun is for everyone
<snip>
WotC made this whole argument moot in one sentence. It's over.
For the sake of my own sanity, I'm going to agree with this last sentence and be done with this.
<snip>
WotC made this whole argument moot in one sentence. It's over.
actually, the argument isn't 'how do people react to tieflings/dragonborn', but 'do they even exist in GH.' It seems to be a rather bitter topic....I think its pretty common sense that fiend/demon blooded people were a signifficant but rare (proportional to population) element in greyhawk.
actually, the argument isn't 'how do people react to tieflings/dragonborn', but 'do they even exist in GH.' It seems to be a rather bitter topic....
I would put both as 'exist, but not common'. Gnomes in 5E are apparently not common either, but GH always had them as being abundant, so I'd change that....To be fair, I was viewing it as a spectrum (one end being "Exists and are viewed as common," the other being "Does not exist")
I was actually more using that as evidence of how common they were. Rare rather. As in, the way they act makes a good case for how rare the object in question was.actually, the argument isn't 'how do people react to tieflings/dragonborn', but 'do they even exist in GH.' It seems to be a rather bitter topic....
If I was running a GH campaign, I would include tieflings as 'rare, used to be non-existent, appeared sometime after Iuz returned to his lands'....Tieflings are less rare possibly by up to an order of magnitude by the end of the story but still exceedingly rare.