Ovinomancer
No flips for you!
Unfortunately, yes. It is a typical response when faced with resistance - find some way to declare the resistance improper, and dismiss it.
*cough* like tone arguments *cough*
Unfortunately, yes. It is a typical response when faced with resistance - find some way to declare the resistance improper, and dismiss it.
I don't think we should take the excesses of online culture as a guide for how to deal with poor social behavior. Just sayin'.
*cough* like tone arguments *cough*
*cough* like tone arguments *cough*
Nice try. But the tone argument is more akin to making the "white knight" accusation - it's deflection. It's an attempt to make the initial rant improper, and dismiss it.
On the topic of speaking up when you see something, or calling out the harassers, it does come to mind that in online culture -- which overlaps heavily with gaming -- standing up for another person has come to be derided as "white knighting".
To be clear, I'm not offering an excuse for anything there -- I'm pointing out that part of the problem of people not speaking up is caused by the sort of vitriol that's directed at anyone who does.
Tone does to some extent matter -- it has a role in shaping the discourse. Resorting to an over the top, vitriolic tone gives the people doing the actual bad things something to hide behind, a way to pretend that THEY are the victims. It can, as seen in this thread, distract from the crucial matters at hand.
Now, that doesn't mean that it's actually OK for people to fixate on tone to the exclusion of the actual issues -- it's only to point out that a certain "tone" can open the door to a conversational turn that veers entirely away from any actual discussion of the issue one wanted to illuminate.
Yes, it does provide a shield, one that at least one poster here was using. However, that being true doesn't mean that presenting an insulting stereotype is okay. I'm of the opinion that most people can reasonably see the difference between those positions.
At any rate, I don't think we disagree enough to keep diverting the discussion to discuss a diversion of the discussion... (it's just getting way to "meta" at this point).
*cough* like tone arguments *cough*