Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince-SPOILERS!!!!

Michael Tree said:
Does anyone have the full text of the prophecy handy? I wonder if Harry being a horicrux jives with it.

"The one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord approaches...Born to those who have thrice defied him, born as the seventh month dies...And the Dark Lord will mark him as his equal, but he will have power the Dark Lord knows not...And either must die at the hands of the other, for neither can live while the other survives...The one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord will be born as the seventh month dies..."
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I think JKR has been building towards Harry being the DADA teacher the whole time. For one thing, the DADA profs never hang around; for another, he taught his fellow students very well during the DA meetings.

If Hermoine teaches anything, it'll be Runes; she's always talking about Runes this and Runes that. Pff. I'd like to see her USE Runes for something! They never use it practically to solve any real-life problems.
 

Hijinks said:
I think JKR has been building towards Harry being the DADA teacher the whole time. For one thing, the DADA profs never hang around; for another, he taught his fellow students very well during the DA meetings.

If Hermoine teaches anything, it'll be Runes; she's always talking about Runes this and Runes that. Pff. I'd like to see her USE Runes for something! They never use it practically to solve any real-life problems.

Agreed on Harry.

And look for JKR to make a major plot point in book 7 center on Hermione's use of Runes. ;)
 

Joshua Dyal said:
Yeah; cliquish teenagers; that's so unrealistic! And it would have been a great idea for Rowling to juggle hundreds of minor characters just to show how Harry and Co. are such social butterflies! (something that I think it demonstrated quite clearly, actually)

Sure, get pissy and extremist on me.

Just an observation that the group contracted and got very insular. There were more characters involved in the other stories and those characters didn't only get shoved aside, but it was made clear in the story that the relationships had suffered and/or died.
 

Tiberius said:
"...And the Dark Lord will mark him as his equal, but he will have power the Dark Lord knows not..."

This part shoots Malfoy defeating Voldemort. We've seen no indication Voledmort considers anyone on his side an equal. Quite to the contrary, their often shown to be little more than tools.
 

Snape's fervent declaration that he is NOT a coward makes me think that he's playing a very, very dangerous game with Voldemort, to the ultimate good of all.
 

Greatwyrm said:
This part shoots Malfoy defeating Voldemort. We've seen no indication Voledmort considers anyone on his side an equal. Quite to the contrary, their often shown to be little more than tools.

Probably...unless perhaps Malfoy's been made a living Horcrux. Harry seemed certain that Malfoy now has the Death Eater mark on his arm, but maybe (yeah, it's a long shot) Voldemorte 'marked' him in another, more powerful way.

The other stretches I can think of are:

1) If (as someone theorized) the Sorting Hat is one of Voldy's horcruxes, then he would have in a way marked Malfoy as an equal by putting him in Slytherin House.

2) If Voldy made Draco a Death Eater, perhaps that marks him as a sort of equal--as Draco passes from a child to an adult or from a student to a full-fledged wizard.

"Marking someone as your equal" is pretty vague; maybe JKR's throwing everyone a curve.
 

My thoughts on the book:

I liked how the books have themselves been getting more adult as the characters age. The tone matures just a little bit in each one. This one, for example, had an instance of one character calling another a slut (Voldemort's uncle, referring to Voldermort's mother - his own sister); had a werewolf that liked to eat people when untransformed; had an instance of Hermione being what appeared to be sexually harrassed/assaulted (by that Corman guy at Slughorn's party - Harry sees her appearance is disheveled and she says she just escaped him), etc. This, I think, is an improvement, since it keeps the books from being too "kiddy" for their audience.

I like the theory that R.A.B. is Regulus Black, though to my knowledge we've never known his middle name. However, that doesn't seem to jive with how Sirius described him. He said he was stupid, and apparently squeamish enough to try and flee the Death Eaters...and was promptly killed. Someone that dumb doesn't strike me as being canny enough to find the location of a Horcrux, penetrate its defenses, and then steal it.

I enjoyed seeing Harry and Ginny get together, since that one seemed to come out of left field. He had never been very interested in her, and she had gotten over him several books back. Now he suddenly wants her badly, and when he makes a move, she's all to happy to respond in kind. For some reason, that just really made me smile. However, I do agree that the their break up seemed to come right out of the end of the Spider-Man movie.

I'm wondering at the format of book 7...locating the lair, getting through the defenses, and destroying a Horcrux seems fairly major...doing it for four seems like it'd require a fairly massive book, plus the final battle, epilogue, etc.

For what it's worth, I think we'll be seeing the last book in July 2007. Book 5 came out, IIRC, July of 2003, so that'd make sense.

I think Snape is evil. He may not be Evil with a capital E, but he's still self-serving and petty, which can be (and in his case is) evil. I don't think he's a triple-agent, or still undercover for the Order. Harry said that Snape had made an Unbreakable Vow, which we know he had, but Dumbledore dismissed it...while Dumbledore may have been lying to Harry, I don't think so, and so I think that proves that Dumbledore was wrong about Snape.

I'm probably going to be wrong about the above paragraph. However, I do hope that Rowling is good enough to stick to her guns, and not have Dumbledore revealing that his death was faked somehow.
 
Last edited:


Alzrius said:
I think Snape is evil. He may not be Evil with a capital E, but he's still self-serving and petty, which can be (and in his case is) evil. I don't think he's a triple-agent, or still undercover for the Order. Harry said that Snape had made an Unbreakable Vow, which we know he had, but Dumbledore dismissed it...while Dumbledore may have been lying to Harry, I don't think so, and so I think that proves that Dumbledore was wrong about Snape.
And Dumbledore did say that because he is more clever than most people, his mistakes are silmerly that much bigger.
 

Remove ads

Top