Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince-SPOILERS!!!!

I can't believe I'm the only one who caught this:

"Well, I certainly did have a drink ...and I came back ... after a fashion ..."

I think this means by drinking the juice, Dumbledore replaced Voldermort's soul shard with his own. He came back...after a fashion... All of him didn't come back. A fraction of his soul is somewhere else. The locket? He'll be back in the next book. Rising from the ashes, as it were.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

JRRNeiklot said:
I can't believe I'm the only one who caught this:

"Well, I certainly did have a drink ...and I came back ... after a fashion ..."

I think this means by drinking the juice, Dumbledore replaced Voldermort's soul shard with his own. He came back...after a fashion... All of him didn't come back. A fraction of his soul is somewhere else. The locket? He'll be back in the next book. Rising from the ashes, as it were.

That would provide some more linkage to the "Order of the Phoenix". Maybe DD is the real Phoenix?

But alas, I think DD's appearance as a portrait in the headmasters office is the final sign. Unlike LoTR, I suspect death is final for JKR's characters.
 

Just finished, and here's my sense of things.

Dumbledore will not be returning.

Hogwart's will continue on, with McGonegal as headmistress, though Harry will not attend. Book 7 will take a new direction, with Hogwart's in the background as the focus shifts to Harry's search for the Horcruxes.

When the 7th book starts, Harry will have mastered Apparition and matured as a wizard, much as Luke Skywalker did between The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi.

Ginny did, in fact, anticipate and accept the breakup. If Harry survives and Voldemort dies, they might get back together. It's just as likely that Ginny will move on, as JKR seems to inject more realism into each successive book.

Snape is evil through and through, and always has been; Dumbledore's unwavering trust in him was his Achilles' Heel in the most classic literary sense--the tragic flaw that was his undoing.

The final battle between Harry and Voldemort will occur on the grounds of Hogwart's, and the nature of the school itself--its history, its secrets--will be of crucial importance to the final outcome. The school will possibly be destroyed in that fight.

And finally, my most off-beat, irrational, baseless prediction:

Harry dies taking Voldemort out. As others have said, the prophecy is rather lame anyway. I just have a gut feeling JKR will end with a bang, which, in my mind, would be fitting. There's little place for a Harry Potter in a Voldemort-less world.

Rowling's entire tale is a rather ingenious (if, at times, pedestrian) retelling of the heroic epic that has been told and retold throughout human history:

In many myths and folk tales, a hero is a man or woman traditionally the protagonist of a story, legend or saga, who commonly possesses abilities or character far greater than that of a typical person, which enable him or her to perform some extraordinary, beneficial deed (a "heroic deed") for which he or she is famous. These powers are sometimes not only of the body but also of the mind. Heroes are typically opposed by villains, and are aided on their quest by a sage or mentor. At the beginning of the tale, the hero is often an orphan or foundling lacking potency or virility, but through the journey gains the strength and resources he or she needs to face the villain. These resources usually come in the form of spectacular or magical items, as well as training and advice from the mentor, whom the protagonist eventually surpasses.
 

Read it, loved it, yadda yadda yadda.

For the record, my completely uninformed opinion is that Neville is actually the one chosen in the prophecy -- the attacks on his parents marked Neville's very soul, while the attacks on Harry simply gave him a scar.

And I think Snape is now a seriously deep-cover double-agent -- most likely Dumbledore was the only one who knew Snape was supposed to kill Dumbledore, and now Snape is all alone, trying to carry out Dumbledore's dying wishes. I still don't buy Snape as truly evil, and I see it as very similar to an incident in G.R.R. Martin's "Storm of Swords"...

The whole Dumbledore death scene rocked hard. Good stuff.
 

takyris said:
For the record, my completely uninformed opinion is that Neville is actually the one chosen in the prophecy -- the attacks on his parents marked Neville's very soul, while the attacks on Harry simply gave him a scar.
I doubt it, since Voldemort didn't commit the offenses against Neville. From what I've seen in other FAQ's, the author intended Neville as a "what if it had been someone else" to make a point, I don't think there's any chance it's him.
He can still be very involved in the fights though, so Neville will contribute to Voldemort's defeat.
 

I also think Snape is very evil. Harry was unable to use the killing curse on the woman who killed Sirius because he did not hate her enough – but Snape hated Dumbledore enough to kill him. I think he utterly self serving and worked for Dumbledore because it allowed him to survive and follows Voldemort because power.
 

Did anyone else notice that after Kreecher and Dobey came back from spying on Malfoy that Harry told Dobey to relax and that he was done, but never told Kreecher to stop following Malfoy?
 

I caught that too, though I came away with the impression that he never really released either of them. Since Dobby isn't actually compelled to obey Harry he might have drawn the conclusion that he was done, but as far as I'm concerned, Kreacher is still on Draco-duty. Could be a very handy source of info about the Death Eaters, if he can be trusted. :)
 



Remove ads

Top