Sorry, that laugh was a result of clumsy fingers on my phone.
I always wonder--how well does 5e have to do before all of the people who said it would go down because of this, that or the other reason come forward and go:
"I'm sorry, internet, I was talking out of my ass. I can't be trusted, ignore me from now on."
?
I suspect that this might be the case. Having extremely low sales in Q1 and Q2 (mostly novels and such), and then suddenly the Starter Set, the PHB, MM, and HotDQ in Q3, and RoT and DMG in Q4 (and the MM was released at the end of Q3, so a fair percentage of its sales might have been in Q4). It would definitely look on the surface like D&D was on a tear.
Ah, yes. The old "get an investment firm representative to ask the CEO of the parent company to ask specifically about non-Magic games' performance during an investors meeting conference call, so that the CEO of the parent company can, while mentioning a bunch of other games and describing the flattish grown in the Games division, can make a throwaway comment about how D&D is doing good, knowing that people will crawl through five pages of transcript, find the comment and report on it on a pro-am newsblog site."
It truly is a classic.
I would imagine that the CEO is aware of the cyclical nature of the core book products, and that it's that this cycle exceeded projections. I think that he's also looking beyond that and going off the fact that the mobile games and the MMO seem to be exceeding expectations, and that they've secured a number of promising licenses.
I don't know how information flows upwards at your company, but every place I've worked, information is collated by worker bees below who put the best possible face on it and send it up. Where manager worker bees reorganize it and put the best possible face on it and send it up. Where VP worker bees, etc. By the time information gets to the CEO, it's no longer the original data. It's been massaged and sanitized by at least one layer of other people.
I'm not sure your assumption here is necessarily accurate. It might be, but it might not. Obviously, the CEO knows some information about a minor product line in his company, but for us, D&D is a big dot deal. For Hasbro (revenue $4 billion), it's a tiny line item (maybe revenue in the ballpark of 1% or 2%, maybe someone here knows).
I do know that most companies try to have product go out to the marketplace constantly. There might be some heavier sales times (like Christmas for a gaming company) and there are obvious surges like when new product is released, but even if you look at WotC, they released product basically every single month of last year. It just wasn't all D&D and even D&D wasn't just 5E (novels, miniatures, boardgames, etc.).
Yeah, because turning D&D into a BILLION dollar movie franchise would just suck so hard. :/
Everyone seems to try to do fantasy in the big epic, and dead serious, style of "Lord of the Rings", and almost nobody manages to make it work - why not go for unapologetically entertaining?
Sure. Just not Michael Bay. Giant explosions with American flags waving in the background doesn't scream fantasy to me.
Just replace them with Forgotten Realms specific flags.Sure. Just not Michael Bay. Giant explosions with American flags waving in the background doesn't scream fantasy to me.
I'm pretty sure that, plus giant transforming robots, plus Megan Fox, is someone's idea of fantasy...