Ranger REG
Explorer
AFAIC, the book shouldn't be the screenplay or the script for a motion picture medium. Even JRR Tolkiens himself once mentioned that.Christoph the Magus said:Well, you're wrong.
Seriously though, they're different mediums. The books are more in depth, but the pacing is horrible. The movies had much better pacing and good character development, but they don't contain the same depth and history of Middle Earth.
A book can go in-depth because the reader can set the pace of his reading. That's why film novelizations (usually based on the first production script ... minus rewrites during shooting as well as post-production editing) tend to have more than what shown in the final film product. You can't do that with a 2-plus-hour feature-length film. And LOTR is actually one book comprised of three acts (a book publisher's decision, not Tolkiens).