Help with a 30th Level Monk

For the ultimate in Epic level munchkining, see how your DM would feel about items familiars plus buying off LA for XP. IIRC you can get about 8 levels worth of LA for free.

Of course, this is incompatible with VoP, but it's better IMO.

EDIT: You said no Unearthed Arcana, so no item familiars. Ah well, never mind.


glass.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Bront said:
Ok, the sainted VoP.
...
Math and following:
[sblock]Stats
Initial
Str 15 8
Dex 15 8
Con 14 6
Int 15 8
Wis 15 8
Cha 10 2

Bonus
4 Dex
8 Wis
12 Con
16 Wis
20 Dex
24 Con
28 Con

+5 to all 6 (Books)

Str 20 +6= 28 +8
Dex 22 +10= 32 +11
Con 22 +8 +2= 32 +11
Int 20 +4= 24 +7
Wis 22 +12 +2= 36 +13
Cha 15 +2 +4= 21 +5

Advance
25 Monk
3 Initiate of Pistis Sophia (BoED 64)
2 Saint


Feats
1 Sacred Vow (BoEd) +2 Diplomacy
1 Improved Grapple +4 to grapple, no AoO
3 Vow of Poverty (BoED 46)
6 Power Attack
9 Resounding Blow (BoED 46)
12 Improved Critical (Unarmed)
15 Freezing the Lifeblood (CW 99) (DC 10 + 1/2 level + Wis mod) Paralyzed 1d4+1, Stunning Fist Use
18 Combat Reflexes
21 Exceptional Deflection (Epic)
24 Imp Ki Strike (Epic)
27 Reflect Arrows (Epic)



Vow of Poverty (BoED 29)
Armor Bonus 4, +1/3 levels (+1 starts at 3) = 10 AC
Exalted Feat: 1+1/2 levels =16 Feats
Endure Elements
Exalted Strike: +5, Considered Good Aligned
Sustinance
Deflection: +1/6 = +5 AC
Resistance: +1/6, starts at 7 = +4 to saves
Attributes: +2, +2/4 starting at 7th, 6 awards
+12 Wis
+10 Dex
+8 Con
+6 Str
+4 Int
+2 Cha
Natural Armor: +1/8 =+3
Mental Shielding :Immunte to Detect Thoughts, Discern Lies, detect alignment
DR: 10/Evil
Greater Sustinance
Energy Resistance 15 Acid, Cold, Electricity, Fire, Sonic
Freedom of Movement
Regeneration Heal 1/level/hour, NL 1/level/5 min
True Seeing ability.


Monk Feats
1 Stunning Fist
2 Deflect Arrows
6 Improved Trip
25 Infinate Deflection (Epic)

Initiate of Pistis Sophia
26 Fist of the Heavens (Wis 15, Stunning Fist)

Exhalted
4 Touch of Golden Ice
6 Servant of the Heavans (BoED 46)
8 Vow of Obediance
10 Nimbus of Light
12 Sanctify Ki
14 Holy Ki
16 Holy Radiance
18 Intuitive Attack
20 Gift of Faith
22 Vow of Abstinence
24 Quell The Profane
26 Vow of Chastity
28 Stigmata

Saint (BoED 185)
Native Outsider Type
Wis Insite Bonus to Armor
Holy Power: All DCs +2
Holy Touch: +1d6 Holy Damage vs Evil, +1d8 bs Evil Undead, Evil Outsider, even if struck from a natural attack by such a being.
Spell-Like Ability: Guidance, Resistance, Virture, Bless. CL=HD, DC Cha based.
Damage Reduction: 10/Evil
Fast Healing 10 : Heals 10 HP per round
Immunities: Acid, Cold, Electricity, Petrification
Keen Vision: Lowlight and Darkvision 60'
Protective Aura: Free action, surround with nimbus of light, 20' Rad, x2 Strenght Magic Circle against Evil and Lesser Globe of Invulnerabiliy, CL=HD.
Resistances: Fire 10, +4 save vs Poison
Tongues: Always under an effect of Tongues.
Stats: +2 Con, +2 Wis, +4 Cha

[/sblock]
Did I miss something? Why did you only take one feat at 1st?
 

Bront said:
Actualy, several people did, you just weren't listening when the gave you thing to look at, and were general attacking of anyone who even responded nicely. And while yes, that is the only other thread I've been in with you, this is exactly what happened. And the fact that you simply stoped posting when people did what you asked has served to show them that you won't admit you were wrong, but will simply run away when you can't argue any more. (Honestly, that's what it looks like to me, as well as several others) And here, you won't drop an issue after others seem sick of it, and the person who asked the question has said what he feels. It seems to me you realy like to debate, but perhaps you need to be willing to look at other's points than simply dismissing them as unproven if they don't quote the rules. I didn't see you quote any either.

Not only that, but keep in mind, the issue you all are arguing about I've already specifcly said "I understand it can be a normal issue and agree that it should normaly be a problem, but in this case, I think I might be able to get away with it specificly because I was asked to munchkin up the character."

Now, if anyone has usefull information to post on the topic at hand, I would appreciate it. I'm still looking to tweek him. Tips on Equipment would be very usefull. I have a lot of money to toy with, and, as I said earlier, have never had an epic level character, and am generaly not up on how to muchnkin him out at times.

I'm sorry if I was rough, but it needed to be said. Take it as constructive criticism like it is ment, and not an attack. And then drop it.

I was just going to pm you, but I figured I would just say something here instead.

Again with the other thread references, even though they are out of place here. There were a lot of overly hostile people there who didnt like anything that they said questioned. One guy said, 'compare to X' and I did, but the comparison didnt turn out the way he liked so he was upset. I understand if you were upset with me saying that I didnt want to use your suggestion, but you have to understand, your suggestion basically said to throw away the entire thing and make something completely different. While that might be a good 'final' suggestion once everything else is considered it doesnt make much for a 'first' suggestion.

I've dropped the issue here several times over, but people keep picking it up. I am not sure how much more apparent that can be other than, 'It depends on your dm, campaign, and character overall'. If people say, 'well, I wouldnt use it' then that falls under dm or character, done.

If, however, they want to say they are following the raw when they are not I'll try to show them where they are messing up.

In this case, nothing in the vop description says that they cannot get the benefit of the spell nor can they get them somehow. To say otherwise they must provide some sort of proof, which has not been done. Also, nothing in the wealth guidelines says that they start with a pile of cash X high and must divy it out to vendors to get their stuff, that is just foolish, and completely against how things actually work in the game (did you have to pay the guy for the gift he gave you? or that item you got off of the dead monsters body? or the treasure horde? or this? or that?)

So really, I have kept on asking them to show rules support but all they can do is attack. I'd rather be defensive than attack back, but apparently people still dont feel like they can defend their positions enough to actually back them, unfortunate.

I like a good debate, but most of what is going on here is 'not' a debate. We have people doing things like making up brand new rules (perfect example, Rystil Arden and his, 'The VoP character has exactly the resources of a level 3 character to purchase stuff.' nonsense) or reading way too much into something (vop characters cant 'somehow' get the bonuses? show me the rule).

If people want to debate then debate, if you want to just attack, as people are doing here, then take it somewhere else. Lots of things are campaign dependent, but bringing those into a rules forum discussion (more than whatever the original poster asks for at least) is just out of place. If you feel that you have a strong standing then show it! If someone else disagrees with your position then explain. That is how these things work. Too many overly aggressive people on this thread though. Just because your churches dont give out favors in your game does not mean it isnt true in 'other' games.


That particular 'discussion' was over even before it started. I find it crazy that a couple of people brought their pile of houserules in and claimed they were rules, but whatever. On this thread I wont talk anymore about the vop inherant bonuses. It should have been over when bront here said that his dm allowed it but some people just wouldnt let it die.

Anyway.


Over the course of this discussion I have lost what sources you are allowed to draw from bront ;/ I am sorry. I believe you said wotc books only, but did you mean 3.0 and 3.5? (some things were not converted, which doesnt necissarily mean that they arent able to be used).

Still though, in every high level party someone should have the Standard of Heroism (out of complete warrior, page 136). At your level the bonuses arent huge, but being morale bonuses you might not have gotten them elsewhere.

Also for you, a Skin of the Troll (out of the xph) might be a good thing, or possibly one of the other skins. (skin of the troll is 5hp back every minute, which isnt very fast at your level, but it is pretty consistant and any longish delay between encounters means you will be pretty stocked up without the need for much healing magic, and it tends to be much better than the ring of regen)

If your dm allows extra progression of monks unarmed damage somehow (the epic rules say no, so probably not) there is monks belt and the Gauntlet of the Talon (just translate it to whichever diety is most fitting in your game). Together they would give you a +10 to your level for some monkish abilities and change your damage to slashing. This is really impressive at preepic levels, see what the dm has to say about them in epic levels.

There are a ton of little items that I guess you could pretty much get all of ;) Personally, I'd ask the dm about an item to increase SR and an item to increase the numer of uses of dim door.

Oh yeah, ring of spell turning (or the epic equivalent) can be very good, if your dm is playing with psionics in his game ;)
 


Bront said:
And the fact that you simply stoped posting when people did what you asked has served to show them that you won't admit you were wrong, but will simply run away when you can't argue any more. (Honestly, that's what it looks like to me, as well as several others)
FWIW, I don't interpret a lack of response that way. The boards are supposed to be, IMO:
  • Fun,
  • Informative, and
  • Friendly.
Should a thread not fulfill those criteria for a poster, there's no reason to belabor the thread's issue and continue to post.

Moreover, at times tempers can get out of hand, and the reasoning is lost to the arguement. Whenever I feel as if I have crossed that line, I remove myself from the thread (for example: the last long thread I was in with Scion recently). I sincerely hope others do the same.

I'm here, first and foremost, 'cause I enjoy it. Why give that up?
 

Scion said:
Still cant find this: Initiate of Pistis Sophia

Where is it from?

Book of Exhaulted Deeds (As labled in the math section, as were some of my equipmen thoughts :))

Any WoTC book but UA or Dragon Mag, with no errata, only banned stuff is items that give elemental immunity.

And I have fast healing 10 from the saint, so not sure i need the troll skin.

Where are Gauntlets of the Talon from? I'll look into them.

I'd pondered going for the Epic slashing damage and vorpal strike instead of the deflection, but then I need 2 stats at 25, one of them being strength, as well as improved crit unarmed. I think I like this a bit better.

Good points Nail, just in the tone of the thread, it seemed the other way to me. (and that's the only comment I'm going to make about anything off topic)
 

So really, I have kept on asking them to show rules support but all they can do is attack. I'd rather be defensive than attack back, but apparently people still dont feel like they can defend their positions enough to actually back them, unfortunate.

OK, I'm back by Bront's request to help him, but he told me there wouldn't be any more of this...

Anyways, I think the key issue here is that you misinterpret my motives here. You are wrong, but I don't care that you are wrong. I am not here to argue about why you are wrong--I am here to help Bront. You want to pick a fight, and although you claim to be attacked, you are the one attacking everyone else. Just take a look at the tone of some of your statements. But frankly, it looks like you're the only one that wants it.
I've dropped the issue here several times over, but people keep picking it up.
OK, this one is most definitely a lie. Read the thread again and all the times that multiple people asked you to stop, including the OP. Then read the times you continued anyway. I fully expect you to try to throw some sort of last word in here, but I still don't care. I'm here to help Bront, as is the point of this thread.
 

Bront said:
Where are Gauntlets of the Talon from? I'll look into them.

Complete Divine, page 97.

They require that you worship Bahamut and take the True Believer Feat (unless you have a 4th level divine spell slot to sacrifice, but you're all monk),

But, it's +5 levels of Monk, slashing unarmed strike, ghost touch, and +4 grapple, and it stacks with the Monk's Belt.
 

seans23 said:
Complete Divine, page 97.

They require that you worship Bahamut and take the True Believer Feat (unless you have a 4th level divine spell slot to sacrifice, but you're all monk),

But, it's +5 levels of Monk, slashing unarmed strike, ghost touch, and +4 grapple, and it stacks with the Monk's Belt.

Yeah, that looks nice, might have to try to sneak in the true believer feat. Maybe if I ditched Improved Grapple. I could always ditch the Freezing the Lifeblood feat instead, but I thought the DC30+ paralyzing attack for 1D4+1 could be useful. Not sure which would be more important. The big bonus is ghost touch (there is one etherial creature already on evil), though the AC bonus (Efective monk level for AC and damage would then be 38) doesn't suck either.
 

Rystil Arden said:
OK, I'm back by Bront's request to help him, but he told me there wouldn't be any more of this...

Sorry, I asked for it to stop, apparently didn't work. Best to just ignore it. I e-mailed you as well.
 

Remove ads

Top