JoeGKushner
Adventurer
ColonelHardisson said:Cripes, they can't win. If they'd said something like that, you know as well as I do that there would be a chorus of "OOOHHHH NNNOOOOSS!!! They are admitting to a naked grab for money! How dare they!" Damned if they do, damned if they don't.
I'm not saying they can win because to me, it is a money grab. It just happens to be done up with some great articles.
ColonelHardisson said:I'm just not seeing the problem here. James Jacobs has explained the rationale, and given that the magazines are, again, separate entities from WotC, I don't think much more explanation is needed. Do you expect Kenzer's Kalamar stuff to stay in lockstep with WotC? It's got the official D&D logo, too, right? Just because some of the same guys doing this book are also overseeing the Dragon articles doesn't mean there has to be cross-referencing. Would it be nice? Yeah, I guess. But I think it kinda indicates that what WotC wants and what Paizo wants may not be entirely the same thing.
I agree and if someone came out and said exactly that, "Piazo and WoTC don't see eye to eye on the power level." I'd go, "Cool." But that's not quite what's being said now is it? Probably one of the problems with you have authors of different boats mingling around the same waters. Can't talk bad or counterdict one thing because it looks bad for the 'parent' so to speak.
Just my opinion mind you.