Eric Tolle
First Post
Actually, due to the different construction techniques we use now, very few, if any of our structures will be standing for any appreciable length of time. Without constant maintenence, buildings will collapse within decades, bringging other buildings down. After a few centuries, the only thing to indicate there was a major city to the casual observer would be a profusion of non-native plants and animals.On Earth, even with shoddy human construction, the answer is "a bloody long time". I'm pretty sure that if we vanished right now, many of the buildings in our cities would be standing in ten thousand years, perhaps much longer.
Climate will make a large difference of course- the ruins and rubble of desert cities like Las Vegas will be visible for much longer than temperate or coastal cities. But in the main, the major traces of mankind's presence would be lines of differing vegetation following major roadways and in cities.
Some references:
Post-human London
Chicago...Without Us
It's arguable that the pyramids and some of the other Egyption structures would still be standing, though even there the elements will have polished it down quite a bit.After a hundred thousand years, something would need to be somehow protected from the elements and made of a hard rock to be easily recognizable as a building, that's for sure. The problem is, of course, that we don't have anything that old, per se, apart from debris of our ancestors.
What will really survive will be protected areas, like caverns and sunken areas, and the equivalent of our middens: landfills will be recognizable as artificial for hundreds of thousands of years. Likewise, even after they are filled in, mines and artificial caverns will be recognizable as artificial from the inclusions of foreign material in the rock layers.
And oh yes, there's also vacuum. the luner modules will probably outlast anything on Earth.
Last edited: