kreynolds
First Post
Artoomis said:Of course, that's a bit more than a rules interpretation, that's more like a House Rule.
I never said how I handle it was a "core rule".
Artoomis said:Of course, that's a bit more than a rules interpretation, that's more like a House Rule.
Piratecat said:If this is somehow a problem, feel free to email me.
Piratecat said:Incidentally, it seems to me that there's no reason that someone should lose their save because two people are in a 5' x 5' square. At the very least, each of them could grab the other and try to use them as cover.![]()
kreynolds said:
I never said how I handle it was a "core rule".
Originally posted by kreynolds
What pontus said. Also, if you're sharing a square with someone, and you get popped with a fireball, you just gave up any chance at a saving throw, even if you're a 250th level rogue, but the worst part is that if you're denied your save, evasion doesn't help you one bit.
Originally posted by EOL
Is this your personal feeling on the subject, a house rule you've implemented in your own campaign or some obscure quasi-official rule I'm unaware of?
Originally posted by kreynolds
DMG, page 76, Evasion and Improved Evasion:
As with a Reflex save for any creature, a character must have room to move in order to evade. A bound character or one in a completely restrictive area (crawling through a 2 1/2 foot-wide shaft, for example) cannot use evasion.
Hope you like the taste of your own foot.
Artoomis said:Really?
Artoomis said:Looks like you were claiming that two characters in a square denies them both their Reflex Saves was THE RULE.
Artoomis said:I guess you are now backing off of that, and only saying that it is YOUR RULE?
Artoomis said:Let's just be clear that's it's not the way the rules are written.
The info in the DMG essentially leaves it up to you to decide when you should and shouldn't allow a reflex save.
IanB said:Then why didn't you say this in the first place, instead of giving your example about the 250th level rogue as if it was fact?
kreynolds said:
I didn't state it as fact. I didn't even supply a page number when I mentioned the 250th level rogue. It was my opinion. I later supplied a page number in the DMG to show that the only thing you can have in this matter is an opinion, as there are no rules to cover this. Also, see my previous post.
EOL said:You've completely reversed yourself.
EOL said:When I asked you if it was a rule
EOL said:When I responded by saying, "No I think it's your opinion." A contention you said, "didn't hold mych water." Once again people took it as you saying this was not your opinion.
EOL said:Now you are quite clearly stating that it is.
EOL said:Perhaps this whole thing was an honest case of miscommunication, I don't know, I'm just telling you what it looked like to me.
kreynolds said:You also have to use some sort of logic.
If you're in a corridor that's 5-feet wide and 10-feet high, and a fireball goes off at your feet, seriously, where are you gonna go? Left? Nope, fireball goes there. Right? Nope, fireball goes there too. Back? Again, that fireball problem. Forward. Again, that fireball problem. Up? Same thing. Down? Same thing. Quite literally, the are you are in is completely filled by the fireball, so there really isn't anywhere to go.
This is all circumstantial, so it's no wonder that there aren't any hard and fast rules to go by.