Hypersmurf
Moderatarrrrh...
youspoonybard said:Hyp, did you see the Sage Advice transcript?
Unsupported by the rules as written.
-Hyp.
youspoonybard said:Hyp, did you see the Sage Advice transcript?
Camarath said:Don't forget to add Half-Golem too.
Darklone said:For me it's pretty clearly written that you do triple damage with a lance while mounted and charging (per feat description). How do I convince someone who tells me that the doubling of the damage as per the Mounted Combat section (mounted charge with lance = double damage) still applies for a factor of four???
MULTIPLYING
Sometimes a rule makes you multiply a number or a die roll. As long as you’re applying a single multiplier, multiply the number normally. When two or more multipliers apply to any abstract value (such as a modifier or a die roll), however, combine them into a single multiple, with each extra multiple adding 1 less than its value to the first multiple. Thus, a double (×2) and a double (×2) applied to the same number results in a triple (×3, because 2 + 1 = 3).
Prove it.Steverooo said:Sorry, guys, you can't have THREE halves!![]()
![]()
![]()
Darklone said:He cites the multiplying section as prove of his argument... he says double plus triple damage is quadrupel damage.
I'd rather go with the stacking rule, but it's an unnamed bonus.
Smack him hard: Thought about that, but it's an internet discussion
My players wouldn't dare...
I guess I have to agree with the smacking... he apparently already declined that explanation.DanMcS said:The triple damage with a charging lance bit from Spirited Charge replaces the double damage with a charging lance normally. It's not in addition. If he doesn't buy that, hit him, and tell him that spirited charge effectively lets all attacks do double damage on a charge, which stacks with the lance double to equal triple damage. It was just poorly worded.