Felon said:From your own vituperative, policy-violating response, it would seem the answer to your question is clearly "no".
I was merely pointing out that some aspects of your comment can apply to the established mechanics for certain non-core base classes, including one that you yourself value and defend (somewhat ornerously).
A duskblade seems narrow, but not so much more narrow than, for instance, a psychic warrior. One man's pointless design is another man's newfound joy.
Psion said:I fear your mightly thesaurus.
Cool. I went from ardent to "ornerous". Well, I may fear your thesaurus, but not your dictionary.![]()
At any rate, I think you sort of miss the point. Not that I entirely agree that it's as narrow as the duskblade, but the psychic warrior is a bit narrow. But here's the rub: there was (and since it is pretty much accepted, is) no pre-existing tool that makes a better psychic warrior than a psychic warrior. The duskblade, on the other hand...
Er, and as far as I know I was just talking about why I wouldn't be using it, not anyone else.
Felon said:When you take power points out of the equation,
what's left that's distinct? The psionic focus stuff?
Psion said:Would it be too much to ask that we a) keep it on topic...
Greylock said:This being the internet and all, this doesn't bother me at all, but fact of the matter is this thread was derailed around about, oh, say, post #4.![]()
zoroaster100 said:...what benefit does Spectral Skirmisher give to someone who takes it.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.