Corinth
First Post
Show some backbone. You explained to her what the risks are, and yet she still gave her permission for someone else to run her character. Her character dies, and she's mad at you? Smack that load of crap down the toliet, where it belongs, and remind her that she's responsible for her character's death--not you. It's part of the game, and she has no right bitching about or passing the buck off on you because she made her choice and decided to take her chances.Valen said:Now, knowing that she wasn't going to be there for the second session, I asked her if she wanted someone else to run her character or remove the character from the adventure. I explained to her that in the latter case, there was the chance her character (and possibly the rest of the party) would be killed. She said to have one of the party members run her character.
The PCs stormed the castle, but were attacked by a wraith in a long, confined stairwell. The wraith used hit and run tactics on the PCs, and though he tried killing all of the PCs equally, only one of them died. You guessed it, my wife's character.
(...)
My wife is pretty mad at me, even though I told her that there are ways to resurrect her character. I am thinking of imposing a DM fiat that prevents characters from dying when the player is not around, but this would invalidate things that have occurred during game play and causes problems for the future in justifying why a character is suddenly missing or nigh invulnerable when a player is not around.
Any in game and/or marital advice? I'd greatly appreciate it.
What's done is done; her character stays dead, and your wife can make a new one if she wants to remain in the game.