I refuse to DM 3/3.5 past 7th level. How about you?

[Eye Tyrant]

Voted 15 or thereabouts

Past 15th Level, it's just too much effort on my part to provide a feasible challenge. It becomes a chore for me to concoct different adventures for my players. At that point I just rather begin something new and retire (or kill off) the party.

 

[MerricB]

I've wound up both my major campaigns about 13th-14th level only because of player attrition. Both lasted over two years but less than three years.

I didn't find running the high-level games any more difficult than running the low-level games. I'm very much looking forward to running the high-level games in Age of Worms when that campaign reaches them.

Cheers!

 

[Nyeshet]

I tend to prefer levels 5 - 15, actually, but I don't have a problem prior to epic. I chose the last option (any level), but in truth I have little interest or desire to run epic due to its - in my opinion - unusual rules and set up. I can and even will run it (well, at low epic levels), but I tend to house rule several aspects of it. I also note that I cannot readily envision a game running past 30th level as I have never DMed one (thankfully), and I hope I never to have to do so.

 

[FireLance]

I consider it a point of pride to be able to run games for characters of any level .

 

[demiurge1138]

If the level can be DMed, I will DM it.

Demiurge out.

 

[Particle_Man]

I am looking forward to running Iron Heroes, as steps have been taken there to make the DM's job easier, without cutting into the players' enjoyment of "crunchy" options.

 

[Bront]

1-20, though closing in on 20 is rough. I voted 1-15 just because I can't stand epic.

 

[ThirdWizard]

I've DMed every level up to 21, and had no problems with it.

 

[Crothian]

one campign I'm running is 24th level...no problems yet

 

[The Shaman]

It depends on the genre, the campaign, and the players.