Ryujin
Legend
Don't most illusion spells do Psychic damage*, if they are not immune to Psychic then they still take the damage.
Good point there. I don't have my book with me to check.
Don't most illusion spells do Psychic damage*, if they are not immune to Psychic then they still take the damage.
Don't most illusion spells do Psychic damage*, if they are not immune to Psychic then they still take the damage.
For example the Purple Worm is immune to illusions, but takes full damage from Illusory Ambush Wizard At-Will (as it is Psychic damage and has the Psychic keyword). Creatures Immune to Illusion could be argued to be immune to the secondary effects but not the damage.
Immune: The monster has immunity to the stated kind of damage or effect. For example, a monster with “immune poison” never takes poison damage and can’t suffer any other ill effect from a poison attack. (from MM)
However, you could equally argue that actually they do because they aren't immune to all the keywords.
"Resistance or immunity to one keyword of a power does not protect a target from the power’s other effects." (from PHB)
It's one area that the rules really aren't clear at all on, since they don't link the keywords to particular aspects of powers.
*Don't have Arcane Power yet but the Illusions in Dragon all did Psychic damage.
Interesting. I don't recall seeing even a single creature with resistance or immunity to psychic damage, so if these powers could still deal damage to illusion-immune creatures that would make illusionsts a powerful build indeed.
Eh, i'd rule (offhand, without looking at the books) that if a monster is immune to illusion, you can't take psychic damage. For example, if the spell isn't getting inside your head to make you THINK you're getting hit by a phantom sword, there's no reason to take damage.
Alternately maybe the psychic sword ripping your brain to bits is what makes you see the illusion... being immune to the illusion doesn't stop you taking the damage under that description.
Furthermore, the second description doesn't totally destroy a thematically valid and sensible build. And when it comes right down to it, we should be trying to have fun, not screw players for making interesting choices.
Yeah, that would work too, but i wouldn't say the first description is destroying anything. It might frustrate a illusionist, but a corner case fight where he has to try a different tactic IS part of the fun.
Besides, when you look at illusion spells in 4e, there pretty much ARE no other effects other than psychic damage and a condition. What's the point of being immune to illusion if you're still going to apply everything in the spell description anyway?