Ltheb Silverfrond
Explorer
True, True. I read it as it is the same attack, but redirected. (Since you don't roll another attack roll) I don't think this is too deadly, since if the first hit missed, it may have been due to a 1, and since you use the same attack roll for the "second chance vs an adjacent foe" I would say it misses too. (and they get more AC, making it less likely to connect)Fieari said:Not true. Whirlwind Attack EXPRESSLY forbids gaining extra attacks on top of those gained by WW itself, naming Cleave as an example, but extending that ban to anything else that would grant more attacks.
Actually, I think it does work with WW attack as written, or it is horribly broken: If it grants an extra attack, and the additional attack misses as well, I would get ANOTHER attack against the original foe. (It doesn't say otherwise, though you would miss again probably) So if it doesn't grant an additional attack, then it would work with Whirlwind attack... AHHH MY BRAIN.
None the less, I agree with you it shouldn't work with Whirlwind attack, though in Epic, mook monsters become less common.
Perhaps a feat should be required to use this in a whirlwind. I would call such a feat "Death Blossom"
I think this feat should be clarified somewhat.
Last edited: