Darkness
Hand and Eye of Piratecat [Moderator]
Same here. Improved Toughness is so-so, but Toughness is a very, very crappy feat.shilsen said:That's what I've done in my campaign. Even so, nobody wants to spend a feat on it.
Same here. Improved Toughness is so-so, but Toughness is a very, very crappy feat.shilsen said:That's what I've done in my campaign. Even so, nobody wants to spend a feat on it.
Buddha the DM said:How would this affect the x Toughness feats from Masters of the Wild? Or should those feats just be ignored altogether?
Jdvn1 said:That's why I'm appalled when people advance monsters and give them nothing but Toughness as their feats...
Not my tarrasques...Crothian said:THe Tarrasque has a few of them.....
Greylock said:Well that would REALLY discourage a player from taking any of the Toughness feats, making each a pre-req for the next. Every single one of the player's feats would end up going towards it. Seems a bit much to me.
Toughness
/\
/ \
Improved \
Toughness \
\
Dwarf's
Toughness
|
|
|
Giant's
Toughness
|
|
|
Dragon's
Toughness
Shellman said:In my book, Toughness as it stands should be trashed and Improved Toughness made the standard. Besides my DM giving the NPC's/ BBEG's/ or Monsters the feat, nobody in my group ever gives there characters Toughness.
I've been thinking about that. Technically, it would qualify for a lot of epic feats, so...Jdvn1 said:Not my tarrasques...![]()