DMZ2112
Chaotic Looseleaf
People always seem to do this math wrong.
"Pathfinder is all in one book!"
"D&D tries to sell us three books, effectively tripling the price of entry!"
Except the Pathfinder Core Rulesbook does not have monsters. The Pathfinder Bestiary is equivalent to the Monster Manual. So really Pathfinder is selling you two books to D&D's three.
Oh my gods, read the thread. You people and your not-thread-reading. I swear.
You're right in that Pathfinder is not a better deal, or at least not a much better deal. I've made that point repeatedly in this thread, which you would know had you read it.
I didn't even mention Pathfinder in my post. I was just saying that if Wizards continues with their historical three-book content division and pricing scheme, it's going to look queer when compared to its contemporaries, who do not do that anymore (if they ever did). Even Pathfinder is not the norm; most of these big-single-book games include some kind of bestiary appendix.
Personally, I don't expect a bestiary appendix from D&D; paying for a separate monster book is perfectly reasonable provided that is release is timely. But if (and I emphasize the IF) we are talking about an indivisible $150 price tag for a tabletop RPG, that is /weird/, no matter what else is on the market.
Last edited: