W
WizO_Pounamu
Guest
Breaking the Code of Conduct is never acceptible, whether in-character or out-of-character.
Someone breaking the CoC using IC acts does not require IC acts to stop them, indeed playing along with it can and often does let the offending player think that his or her actions are acceptible.
That being said, I have yet to see any evidence that anyone told those involved clearly OOC that their actions were unwanted and offensive. I am not one of the WizOs whose sorry job it was to review those logs directly, so if anyone has evidence to the contrary by all means contact me in email.
What happened with WizO Tiger is an unfortunate but cruel twist of circumstance. He may have been dealing with an issue within his own area at the time, unaware of the full impact of the problem in the CRT. (Perhaps I should point out that if he had managed to deal with the CRT situation as well, it certainly would have had nothing IC.)
Room Disruption does not have to be caused by a direct CoC violation but also IC actions that are disrupting the room that they are done in. A fight also does not have to be violent, as we often see in pie situations. There was disruption as well as offensive content in the room. This was acted upon when the log was reviewed.
I should like to point out that in many situations where the log must be checked after the incident, Warns are issued whether the player is online at the later time or not. We are only able to contact players if they are on the site or have their email address "attatched" to their screen name by typing in the command /email followed by the email address wished to use. To check what email address you have on a screen name, type in "/email" without anything after it while logged in as that screen name. (Your email details using this command are visible only to site staff.)
We will not discuss anyone's Warns with anyone other than the person who recieved them. Queries reguarding your own Warn or about Warns in general may be sent to admin@wizardsmoderator.com.
As a side note, one of my colleagues has pointed out that baby-eating in itself mentioned in a lot of children's stories (eg. Babayagga, Hansel and Gretel), which adds its own difficulties to saying flat out what is and isn't acceptible. So I say again: If you see something that you do not think is acceptible, tell them clearly OOC in a PM.
- Pounamu
Someone breaking the CoC using IC acts does not require IC acts to stop them, indeed playing along with it can and often does let the offending player think that his or her actions are acceptible.
That being said, I have yet to see any evidence that anyone told those involved clearly OOC that their actions were unwanted and offensive. I am not one of the WizOs whose sorry job it was to review those logs directly, so if anyone has evidence to the contrary by all means contact me in email.
What happened with WizO Tiger is an unfortunate but cruel twist of circumstance. He may have been dealing with an issue within his own area at the time, unaware of the full impact of the problem in the CRT. (Perhaps I should point out that if he had managed to deal with the CRT situation as well, it certainly would have had nothing IC.)
Room Disruption does not have to be caused by a direct CoC violation but also IC actions that are disrupting the room that they are done in. A fight also does not have to be violent, as we often see in pie situations. There was disruption as well as offensive content in the room. This was acted upon when the log was reviewed.
I should like to point out that in many situations where the log must be checked after the incident, Warns are issued whether the player is online at the later time or not. We are only able to contact players if they are on the site or have their email address "attatched" to their screen name by typing in the command /email followed by the email address wished to use. To check what email address you have on a screen name, type in "/email" without anything after it while logged in as that screen name. (Your email details using this command are visible only to site staff.)
We will not discuss anyone's Warns with anyone other than the person who recieved them. Queries reguarding your own Warn or about Warns in general may be sent to admin@wizardsmoderator.com.
As a side note, one of my colleagues has pointed out that baby-eating in itself mentioned in a lot of children's stories (eg. Babayagga, Hansel and Gretel), which adds its own difficulties to saying flat out what is and isn't acceptible. So I say again: If you see something that you do not think is acceptible, tell them clearly OOC in a PM.
- Pounamu