Hypersmurf
Moderatarrrrh...
Nifft said:No. Even if you were allowed to stack the ability with itself, which you are not, "dance" doesn't qualify. Cheers, -- N

-Hyp.
Nifft said:No. Even if you were allowed to stack the ability with itself, which you are not, "dance" doesn't qualify. Cheers, -- N
Hypersmurf said:He can channel all his bardic music through You Are My Sunshine, if he wants.
Nifft said:That's not a list of end-conditions, that's a list of precluded actions. Death is not listed, for example. Do you claim that a Bard can play an instrument and make a Climb check at the same time? (Or while dead?)...
Cheers, -- N
I'd argue that someone who is already singing precludes another instance of that person's singing. However...Artoomis said:The only limtiations are those listed or something that would cause the base requirement (must be able to "sing" and be heard "singing") is still met.
This is very clever, and I don't have a direct rules-based counter argument for it.Artoomis said:As Hyp correctly points out, though, there is not even a need to start a new song to activate a different Inspire ability.
The corollary to this is that all spells might have exactly the same verbal and somatic components unless explicitly stated otherwise. That's gonna make explaining how spellcraft works really tricky. Yeah, sorry, but "it's magic" doesn't always fly.Hypersmurf said:He doesn't need to sing Eye of the Tiger to Inspire Courage, and then stop singing Eye of the Tiger and start singing You're The Best to Inspire Greatness. He can channel all his bardic music through You Are My Sunshine, if he wants.
LOL! No, not yanking anyone's chain.mvincent said:Edit: ah... if the winky emoticon means you didn't even believe what you said at all (and were just yanking my chain), then ya got me.
That's all true. Unfortunately, these two "rages" could not possibly be the same source. For you to have two, then the second ability must by definition be called something else (otherwise the rules within the Rage ability preclude you using both). Let's call this other ability potato:mvincent said:"Same source" in D&D does not refer to the "same item" (or same caster), but rather the "same effect” (or “same spell”). The rules say say that modifiers "do not stack if they have the same type or come from the same source (such as the same spell cast twice in succession)".
Infiniti2000 said:The corollary to this is that all spells might have exactly the same verbal and somatic components unless explicitly stated otherwise. That's gonna make explaining how spellcraft works really tricky. Yeah, sorry, but "it's magic" doesn't always fly.![]()
Ah. We are in agreement. I was indeed under the impression that your sub-thread related to using the barbarian rage ability twice (in a hypothetical situation where "A barbarian can fly into a rage only once per encounter" didn't exist).Infiniti2000 said:you had some other vision for getting two "rages" to function at the same.![]()
You're asserting motive and mind-reading, which aren't suitable for polite conversation.Artoomis said:The arguments against this all seem to revolve around trying to justify a gut feeling that this is not allowed.