StMalice
First Post
I've been asked to play a game with some new comers to D&D. They've played a few games already, but nothing past 10th level. The DM and I decided to start a 15th level game to give them an idea to how powerful you can become. One of the topics that came up was rings of invisibility. However, (this is a 3.0ed game) the rules state that making a spot check DC20 within so many feet of the invisible creature you will see them, or have at least a good enough idea where they are that you can make an attack. This is pretty bogus in my opinion.
Compare this then to my character, Rouge7/Slayer of Domiel 8, hide of 27. That being the case if I'm next to a character who turns invisible and I'm hiding said creature trying to make a spot check makes one and rolls a modified 20. So he knows something invisible is there only not sure what, however, it's completely oblivious to me.
Does this strike anyone as, I dunno, odd? Invisible is just that invisible, surely you'd be more well hidden or out of sight then someone just hiding. Has anyone addressed this in their games? House rules?
Compare this then to my character, Rouge7/Slayer of Domiel 8, hide of 27. That being the case if I'm next to a character who turns invisible and I'm hiding said creature trying to make a spot check makes one and rolls a modified 20. So he knows something invisible is there only not sure what, however, it's completely oblivious to me.
Does this strike anyone as, I dunno, odd? Invisible is just that invisible, surely you'd be more well hidden or out of sight then someone just hiding. Has anyone addressed this in their games? House rules?