I can’t imagine the headache you’ll have when you get to the round-robin tournament!This query is not directly related to this project we're working on, but I have a question maybe you guys can help me with.
One of the most difficult part of archiving the IRON DM tournaments is that there is no set format for entries or judgements or consistent names for the rounds.
Right now in my archiving I am labeling the rounds as follows
- Round One - Match One through Four
- Round Two - Match One and Two
- Final Round - Championship Match
When there was a special final final round when the previous IRON DM got to face off against the new winner (I think this happened twice) I call it "IRON DM OF ENWORLD SPECIAL"
But when there is a third place match I want a name that fits with the first three I listed. The problem is sometime it takes place before the final round and sometimes it take place after - so calling it the third round or fourth round could be confusing. I would call it the "Semi-Final Round" except some judges have referred to Round Two that way (which is technically correct),, though others have called it as such.
Right now I am just calling it "Third Place Match" but that does not fit the format of numbering the rounds (rather than describing its outcome.
According to the "official" nomenclature of single-elimination tournaments (and I know at least one tournament I ran had a double-elimination final) the rounds should be:
- Quarter Final Round (8)
- Semi-Final Round (4)
- Final (or Championship) Round (2)
- Third Place Play-Offs (losers of Semi-Final)
Anyone have thoughts suggestions for naming the rounds consistently?
Same.In our most recent contest, after thought about this very question I believe I labeled them Round 3, Third Place Match; and Round 3, Championship Match. I thought doing so made it clear enough as to what was what.
Same.
nemmerle said:I've said it before, but my favorite reply to a round as an IRON DM JUDGE was "Man, It is entries like these that make me wish I could eliminate the both of you."![]()
Nemmerle: the original nemmerlesque judge.While the original judgement this is from is lost to time and unstable boards, I am glad I quoted in during a 2003 tourney because it is hilarious
Me in October 2003 said:Sorry to keep harping on this - but I don't think this game can be even remotely fair with opponents using different ingredients - especially considering how it is typically judged, not to mention that some sets of ingredients are inherently more difficult than others even when chosen to be of equal difficulty of other match-ups of the same round.
Wicht in reply said:I gotta agree. If its not in the rules it oughta be. Same ingredients or none at all.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.