Is it cheating to start a PC above 1st level?

No. I prefer my players to start their characters at higher than first level when the campaign begins... usually around 3rd. High enough that they can have some flexibility in creating their characters and make something that's fun for them, and also flexibility for me as a DM (I can throw little hordes at them, or one monster, or a combo of both. Also reduces the player deaths in the first game of a campaign... which is no fun in my opinion)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I don't like starting PCs at first level because they have no background. They haven't done anything challenging yet. That's very restrictive when you want to make an interesting character.
 

Personally, I prefer starting characters at 2nd level. This helps explain any multi-classing the character might want to do. It eases certain concepts in better.

Although apprentice classes can do that, too, of course. But then, they eliminated those from the revised Dungeon Masters Guide, didn't they? Or so I heard. Don't intend on ever picking it up. If they were, though, bad move in my opinion. Even with those, then, technically it has to be a favored class that's apprenticed in. So there's already some muxing about with the rules for, say, an elven fighter/bard as an apprentice level character.

As such, no, no cheating for starting higher than first level characters.

Not to mention that a lot of campaigns never reach particularly high.

With that in mind, there reaches a point where killing orcs, goblins and kobolds becomes tedious and boring. Where you want to swat dragons and demons and tarrasques. Though I often DM myself, I can fully see getting fed up with level one after, say, 4 campaigns that were stopped at level 5 or so, and not wanting to "start over" again. Even if the monsters and setting change, I'd still want to see some of that higher level stuff get used as opposed to just being temptations that were never realized, so to speak.

As it is, I'm rotating three campaigns, two of which started at level one, another at level two, but in two cases, they've both been running for some time, and with the other level one campaign, it was just meant to be a one-shot so I could actually get some use out of my Midnight campaign book, and I didn't particularly feel like making an adventure up, so just used the level-one adventure from the book. The other two games were also levels 5 and 9 or so respectively, anyway, by that point.

In either case...no, higher level starting games are fine. With the exception of the Midnight one-shot that turned into an on-going game, all of my one-shots have started well above 1st level, as a matter of fact.
 

Frankly I have started so many character at 1st level that I have gotten sick of it. 4 times out of 5, the game broke up before we had reached 6th level. I have "been there done that" enough times with low level play to know what it's about.
 

Hi!

I don't think its "cheating" to start at higher levels. But I prefer to start at 1st level. Our group tend to play long campaigns so that you see the growth in power quite clearly. And if you just have played a high level Barb its just another feel with your 1st level Fig when you think: "Oh, there is this Ork with his Greataxe. I can take ONE Hit, but please don't let him Crit.... :) Later when you reach 4th level you feel really powerful!

Kodam
 

It's only cheating, if the DM doesn't allow it.

It's more fun to start at 1st level, but this isn't always an option.

Bye
Thanee
 

Crothian said:
Is it cheating? No.

Do I like to do it? No, I perfer to start at 1st to have character growth, but I have started with higher level characters before. It is neither wrong or right, its just choice.
What Crothian said ... that's my opinion on it (not that I'm blindly following him or nothing ;) but I just happen to have an opinion that coincides with his)
 

As a more constructive approach.

With LA races you can have both - starting at 1st level and have a higher ECL.

Maybe that helps?

Bye
Thanee
 

No, it's not cheating. But everyone has to be in agreement, and all start with characters of the same level.

In our only 3e campaign, we had a small group (four players plus DM), and everyone planned on multiclassing. So all of the characters started out at 1st level in each of the their classes, or as second-level characters.

Later, another player joined the group. Her character started at the same level as the other characters at that point -- 6th level characters, 3/3 in their various classes.
 

Hmm depends is this 1st level PC going to be trying to kill gods with the rest of the 30th level party? (ref: dead's other thread).
 
Last edited:

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top