Gothmog said:
Cat owners always try to say cats are so intelligent and independent, while in fact the opposite is true- cats are not social creatures and don't understand a group or family bond.
Gothmog, I understand you don't like cats, and you're free to not like them. However, on this matter you are factually, scientifically incorrect. You are holding to a view of felines that has, in the past decade or two, been found to be wrong.
When left to their own devices, housecats live in colonies, and are social. We have bred them to be social, and it is not unnatural to the feline family (lions are quite social). They are not dogs, and have their own behaviors, but they are social nontheless.
They tend to panic easily, have fear aggression problems where they injure their owners or other people
Any animal can have fear and aggression problems. It is no more common with cats than with dogs. If you don't handle either probperly, you'll get hurt.
Numerous ethological studies have shown dogs are MUCH smarter than cats with the capability for complex social interaction and problem solving (as a whole- there are some really stupid dogs out there too).
Cites, please. Because my veterinarian wife, who makes her living caring for both cats and dogs, and has studied their behavior and mentation professionally, has not seen such. Given that there is no well-accepted definition of "smart" to begin with, I doubt you'll find a study that can provide an overall quantitative comparison of intelligence between species.
In any event, having social abilty is not a measure of intelligence. Otherwise, ants, bees, and sheep (all of whom have coimples social interactions) would be considered geniuses.
So yes, hating cats and being a gamer is perfectly acceptable.
It is fine to dislike a type of animal. "Hate" is a pretty strong word, but well enough, I suppose. You don't need to justify it.