Thanks. I hadn't seen it.
I don't really think this is true.
I can think of clear RPG rules that don't have exploitable loopholes. The rules for rolling to hit in D&D have always been pretty clear, and don't seem to involve exploitable loopholes.
Ah, OK, in that case I agree that rules like that can have issues, yes.i was thinking more along the line of stealth or any other rules that involve adjucating relative distance and size of imaginary creatures and cover etc.
"I steal his pants!"RAW: You can sneak attack with a trebuchet or ballista.
"I steal his pants!"
But this is an internet message board! I believe we are required by international law to speculate aimlessly and critique every minor detail!Apparently, there are two people in this world who have to watch every single word they utter, for fear of throwing the world onto unmitigated chaos...
...The Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve...
...and Whomever is serving as the Sage for WotC.
For God 's sake, let the man write his column!Sometimes, a blurb is just a blurb, not the reason to wage Geek-jihad. (Gee-had?)
RACS: Sneak attack with a siege weapon? Are you kiddin' me?I was just thinking of the same thing, and the whole siege weapon sneak attack made me understand how the rules as fun part is going to most likely work.
Siege weapons are ranged weapon attacks, sneak attack can be applied to ranged attacks.
RAW: You can sneak attack with a trebuchet or ballista.
RAI: I imagine they didn't consider people sneak attacking with siege weapons, so the intent is probably you shouldn't be able to.
RAF: I like the idea of Bard from the last hobbit movie, sneak attacking with that ballista, or a rogue using a cannon to hit a tarrasque in the knee, so in this case under most situations I think the RAW works fine and my players can sneak attack with siege weapons just fine.
RACS: Sneak attack with a siege weapon? Are you kiddin' me?
Lan-"backstrike is a better term, ditched by 3e, as it both describes what you are doing and how"-efan