Sir Hawkeye
First Post
kreynolds said:
Why should damage be exempt when it's a similar effect? Following your logic, the endure elements spell and the resist elements spell should stack because the end result is not 100% identical, as the two spells provide different levels of protection. However, that is not the case. Both of the spells do in fact provide similar protection, meaning their effects are similar, thus they don't stack. So, if those two spells don't stack because of their similar effects, neither would flaming and flaming burst.
Reasonable enough.
But those spells don't stack because energy resistances always overlap.
What I meant to say was that damage seems more additive than most other categories although I'm not sure why.
At any rate, you are quite correct on their stacking because (IIRC) the Flaming Burst description states that the weapon "acts as a flaming weapon" or something to that effect. Obviously, Flaming will not stack with itself.