FrozenNorth
Hero
Oooh! I know this one! Like it’s only meta humor if it’s cynical and mean-spirited, not if it’s wholesome.I guess it's not a heist if it's for altruistic reasons. It can only be a heist if it's for personal gain.
Oooh! I know this one! Like it’s only meta humor if it’s cynical and mean-spirited, not if it’s wholesome.I guess it's not a heist if it's for altruistic reasons. It can only be a heist if it's for personal gain.
I bet lots of people have succeeded. Only WotC seems to be having a hard time with it.If I say X, then I know what I meant. If someone quotes me, and says actually it's Y, it's not hard to see these subjective interpretations being articulated as arguments.
People have tried -- and failed -- to dump alignment in D&D for years.
Because lots of people don’t want it dumped.I bet lots of people have succeeded. Only WotC seems to be having a hard time with it.
Sorry. In an earlier comment you said by RAW gold dragons couldn't be anything but lawful good. I pointed out how that wasn't true in the MM and you never responded. So I mistakenly thought you were still talking about I misunderstanding of RAW. I missed the comments in between, my apologies.What you quoted, was in context of a lawful good gold dragon. If the dragon is not lawful good, then it's a different story.
It's not that hard for you to read what people write and respond in context. End of story.
I don't think anyone would refuse to buy 1D&D because it scrapped alignment, if it did so. The majority of new players seem to have a strong dislike for alignment in the first place, and old hands that want it would just house rule it back in.Because lots of people don’t want it dumped.
You also don't need to be unlawful to support Goldfinger, er the Golden Vault.Not all gold dragon's are lawful good: end of story. It is not that hard.
In D&D lawful can mean other things than "follows the laws." Also end of story. Let's see if this story can end as often as Brady's football career.What you quoted, was in context of a lawful good gold dragon. If the dragon is not lawful good, then it's a different story.
It's not that hard for you to read what people write and respond in context. End of story.
Luckily for us, I don't actually enjoy arguing. Arguing is only an ends to a means, where the means is some sort of progress. So end of story.In D&D lawful can mean other things than "follows the laws." Also end of story. Let's see if this story can end as often as Brady's football career.
It's not hard. I haven't used alignment in decades. Removing it from the game makes the story much more sensible, in my experience. YVMV.If I say X, then I know what I meant. If someone quotes me, and says actually it's Y, it's not hard to see these subjective interpretations being articulated as arguments.
People have tried -- and failed -- to dump alignment in D&D for years.
In my game, I have alignment but it's just a very vague frame of reference and it barely has any weight.It's not hard. I haven't used alignment in decades. Removing it from the game makes the story much more sensible, in my experience. YVMV.