payn
Glory to Marik
I don't even know what that is supposed to mean.Especially since I'm sure most of us are not rich men.
I don't even know what that is supposed to mean.Especially since I'm sure most of us are not rich men.
If Actor A is the Poor Man's Actor B, and I am a Poor Man, one would suppose I'd prefer Actor A?I don't even know what that is supposed to mean.
Are you somehow implying that sipping coconut drinks on a private yacht in the West Indies surrounded by a staff of beautiful people who obey our slightest hint is somehow preferable to playing pretend elves with Catpiss Man in his mothers cellar? Preposterous!Especially since I'm sure most of us are not rich men.
Why can't we play pretend elves with Catpiss Man on a yacht in the West Indies surrounded by beautiful people? Does it have to be an either/or? I'm sure his mother would love to go on a boat trip.Are you somehow implying that sipping coconut drinks on a private yacht in the West Indies surrounded by a staff of beautiful people who obey our slightest hint is somehow preferable to playing pretend elves with Catpiss Man in his mothers cellar? Preposterous!
An elegant solution sir!Why can't we play pretend elves with Catpiss Man on a yacht in the West Indies surrounded by beautiful people? Does it have to be an either/or? I'm sure his mother would love to go on a boat trip.
I think the concept is that "x is a poor man's y" is that they're similar products, made to do similar jobs, but one is the expensive version and the other the cheap knockoff you get if you can't afford the real thing.If Actor A is the Poor Man's Actor B, and I am a Poor Man, one would suppose I'd prefer Actor A?
(Yes, I know, "Poor Man's" in this instance refers to someone with less talent or who is less successful. I guess you could say that was a "Poor Man's" attempt to be witty).
Poor man's Mick Jones, amIright?When I first looked at the thread title I read it as Paul Weller.