Nemesis Destiny
Adventurer
Once again, I'm not really liking Monte's direction here, but the discussion in this thread is quite interesting 

Maybe that's the point? Perhaps the column isn't just a soapbox, maybe the D&D community is being used in a sense. Monte can toss out a theoretical idea that hasn't been playtested, listen to the brainstorming commotion, and discover some of the perceived obstacles to implementing that idea. And isn't that exactly what people were asking for, to be involved more with these columns? If so, we got exactly what we asked forOnce again, I'm not really liking Monte's direction here, but the discussion in this thread is quite interesting![]()
That IS interesting, but since you posted that here and not on the other thread, I must be like the soup nazi: "No xp for you!" sorry@LurkAway , an interesting thing: There have been two separate threads on every L&L topic, one here and one in general. I've read every post in every one of them, and participated in most. The interesting thing is that they almost always develop differently. I don't mean that different people say slightly different things. Rather, the topics tend to go in totally different directions. I recall two exceptions, where there was a parallel discussion, this topic being one of them. Make of that whatever you want.![]()
That IS interesting, but since you posted that here and not on the other thread, I must be like the soup nazi: "No xp for you!" sorry![]()