Re
Aggeman,
I don't disagree with you. I just don't agree that a person is considered cover in the same way that a wall would be considered cover for area of effect spells.
That would mean the last guy in a line of five guys is nearly totally immune to the lightning bolt, and thus it wouldn't really be an area of effect spell.
The cover must be something that will actually halt the lightning bolt such as a wall. If that wall is destroyed, then the wall doesn't provide cover either because it was destroyed.
A person should not count as cover because they provide no protection against an area of effect spell that they cannot halt. The spell conducts right through them in the case of a lightning bolt or spreads around them in the case of a fireball.
Aggeman,
I don't disagree with you. I just don't agree that a person is considered cover in the same way that a wall would be considered cover for area of effect spells.
That would mean the last guy in a line of five guys is nearly totally immune to the lightning bolt, and thus it wouldn't really be an area of effect spell.
The cover must be something that will actually halt the lightning bolt such as a wall. If that wall is destroyed, then the wall doesn't provide cover either because it was destroyed.
A person should not count as cover because they provide no protection against an area of effect spell that they cannot halt. The spell conducts right through them in the case of a lightning bolt or spreads around them in the case of a fireball.
Last edited: